The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 06, 2016, 11:55am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. View Post
Steve:

My definition is jewelry is very simple: If you weren't wearing when you came out of the womb, it is jewelry. !

MTD, Sr.
So no uniforms or other garments??
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 06, 2016, 11:58am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Fremont, NH
Posts: 1,352
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. View Post
Steve:

My definition is jewelry is very simple: If you weren't wearing when you came out of the womb, it is jewelry. !

MTD, Sr.
Including eyeglasses, braces on teeth (especially the brightly-colored designer versions), or an insulin pump either attached to a belt or in a back pocket?
__________________
Ted
USA & NFHS Softball
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 06, 2016, 07:48pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 1,640
Quote:
Originally Posted by chapmaja View Post
I think the rule is unfair because it takes away what would have been a fair ball and possible home run from the offense.
The rule didn't take anything away from the offense...the defense did!

Why reward the batter if she didn't hit the ball well enough for it to be out of the fielder's reach. If you want a home run, hit it higher next time!

Last edited by BretMan; Fri May 06, 2016 at 07:51pm.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 06, 2016, 09:12pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by chapmaja View Post
This was my thought as well, however the umpire in question, who is also in charge of officials for our state athletic association said it is a 2 base award.

As others have said, when a fair batted ball is deflected out of play it is a 2 base award. If this situation actually happened, as it was presented, I would have gotten it wrong.

I'm torn on my opinion of this rule. I think the rule is unfair because it takes away what would have been a fair ball and possible home run from the offense. At the same time, for the defense to come over and make a play to touch the ball, means they likely have made a very good play just to get in position for this to happen.
So you consider it unfair if a defender leaps, reaches over the fence and catches a ball in flight that would have been a home run save a great defensive play? The offense failed.

OTOH, if the ball is short of the fence, but deflects off a player without hitting the ground or fence and clears the fence in fair territory, the batter-runner is awarded a HR/4B award even though it was undeserved. But the defense failed.

IMO, no problem with this rule and is consistent throughout the game.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 06, 2016, 09:49pm
High Five Master
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Southwest Missouri
Posts: 669
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA View Post
Guess you need to read the other responses It is a 2 base award

I believe it is 8.4.3.H for NFHS


2 bases because it went dead?if over in fair it would be four bases?

Just clarifying bc we all know it's gonna happen in my next game if I don't check!
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 07, 2016, 06:36am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueDevilRef View Post
2 bases because it went dead?if over in fair it would be four bases?
Yes.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 07, 2016, 07:13am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by CecilOne View Post
Yes.
What he said
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Interesting Question elker13 Basketball 16 Sun Feb 01, 2009 01:21pm
I think interesting question 81artmonk Basketball 29 Wed Feb 21, 2007 11:48am
Interesting scenario A Man for All Seasons Basketball 7 Mon Feb 19, 2007 08:10pm
Interesting Scenario coach41 Basketball 42 Sun Apr 09, 2006 08:03am
Here's an interesting question ref18 Football 17 Thu Apr 06, 2006 08:10pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:58pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1