The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sat Sep 13, 2003, 09:08pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 298
Here is the situation, you are have the plate on a 2 person womens fast pitch game. This play happened in a fall college game, but it could happen with any age group in any federation.

Nobody is on base. There is a routine bunt that the 3rd baseperson fields cleanly and fires to 1st only no one is covering. You notice that your parter(Kellerumps were split up so it's not us) is caught up in "No Mans Land" as the ball bounces into right field and the BR breaks for 2nd.

What do you do?????
__________________
We Don't Look for Problems.....They find Us.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sat Sep 13, 2003, 09:55pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 164
Quote:
Originally posted by kellerumps
Here is the situation, you are have the plate on a 2 person womens fast pitch game. This play happened in a fall college game, but it could happen with any age group in any federation.

Nobody is on base. There is a routine bunt that the 3rd baseperson fields cleanly and fires to 1st only no one is covering. You notice that your parter(Kellerumps were split up so it's not us) is caught up in "No Mans Land" as the ball bounces into right field and the BR breaks for 2nd.

What do you do?????
First, one question. Where is No Man's Land? Could I assume that the BU was in no position to make a call at 2B?

If this is the case, as the PU, I would be about a third of the way down the first base line anyway watching for a running lane violation. After that, I hopefully would notice that my partner was in a tough predicament. Therefore, I would take a quick left and get as close to 2B as I can but leave myself some room to maneuver to 3B if needed. This would be just as if my partner went out to cover a fly ball. The infield would be mine.

If I don't notice, then I would just pray that the BR gets to 2B without incident.

This situation or something similar would have to be discussed in pregame.
__________________
"If you want something that is fair in life, hit a ball between first and third base."
John Palko
Pittsburgh, PA
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sat Sep 13, 2003, 11:23pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: woodville, tx
Posts: 3,156
I agree with John, since PU already headed slightly in that
area, go and stay with the R. BU should head for HP in the
event there are other overthrows. Had this happend in the
18U Nationals [final two undefeated teams] game. I was PU,
and went on to 2B, where R beat the throw. Partner had
advanced towards HP. I thought it was good coverage since
this was only R'r and had nothing to worry about at HP.

glen
__________________
glen _______________________________
"Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things
that you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines.
Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails.
Explore. Dream. Discover."
--Mark Twain.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sun Sep 14, 2003, 06:35am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: north central Pa
Posts: 2,360
I pretty much agree with what John & Glen have already said. It happens more frequently that one might think that BU will get caught in foul on an overthrow at 1b - on a bunt or other play by F4 or F9. I go over it in our pre-game get together. PU should holler "I've got second & third", allowing BU to move toward Home.

Steve M
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sun Sep 14, 2003, 07:06am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 994
Don't know if it is proper or not, but my "normal" partner and I do this all the time. Particularly on a grounder to deep F3 or similar when BU has to go into foul territory. We have the base umpire make the call at first and if there is an overthrow or such, the PU goes to second and the BU watches to insure the ball does not go into DBT. He will then head for home if the ladies start "throwing the ball around" and making other errors.

FYI, we also "go out" much more than others. It takes extra hussle, but not only do I think it gives better coverage, it makes us keep our heads in the game.
__________________
Dan
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sun Sep 14, 2003, 12:21pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Sherman, TX
Posts: 4,387
I pretty much agree with what has already been said.
__________________
Scott


It's a small world, but I wouldn't want to have to paint it.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Sun Sep 14, 2003, 02:50pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 549
Wink

Pretty much what the other have said BUT I would ask my partner "How the hell he got hung up on a bunt to 3rd". Now I can see and have had this happen on a bunt or slap situation down 1st base line and the BU stays in foul territory to make the call BUT down 1st base line he should of been in fair territory and able to take the runner to 2nd though he might get caught up where he has to stay outside instead of moving in to where I will take the runner to 3rd of there is a play.....


JMO's

Don
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 15, 2003, 11:34am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Glendale, AZ
Posts: 2,672
I agree with the responses on how this play should be covered, PU takes the BR to second, and third, if necessary, and BU rotates to home.

My question is how often do you all have BU partners that want to make this or the ground ball to right field call from foul ground?

My experience is that it does not happen often, but each time that I have seen it, I thought that the BU could have hustled more and gotten inside the diamond to make the call at first and be in position to take the runner around, if necessary. I realize that there will be times that the BU cannot get inside, but these should be very rare.

Just curious.
__________________
It's what you learn after you think you know it all that's important!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 15, 2003, 11:37am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally posted by Andy
I agree with the responses on how this play should be covered, PU takes the BR to second, and third, if necessary, and BU rotates to home.

My question is how often do you all have BU partners that want to make this or the ground ball to right field call from foul ground?

My experience is that it does not happen often, but each time that I have seen it, I thought that the BU could have hustled more and gotten inside the diamond to make the call at first and be in position to take the runner around, if necessary. I realize that there will be times that the BU cannot get inside, but these should be very rare.

Just curious.
Maybe they should adopt ASA's new BU positioning with no runners on base in slow pitch. That would solve the problem.



[Edited by IRISHMAFIA on Sep 15th, 2003 at 04:28 PM]
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 15, 2003, 12:32pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 164
Quote:
Originally posted by IRISHMAFIA
Maybe they should adopt ASA's new BU positioning with no runners on base. That would solve the problem.
Is the new positioning on the right hip of F4, not literally? I thought I heard that somewhere.
__________________
"If you want something that is fair in life, hit a ball between first and third base."
John Palko
Pittsburgh, PA
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 15, 2003, 01:42pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally posted by BigUmpJohn
Quote:
Originally posted by IRISHMAFIA
Maybe they should adopt ASA's new BU positioning with no runners on base. That would solve the problem.
Is the new positioning on the right hip of F4, not literally? I thought I heard that somewhere.
In OKC, Henry stated off F4's right shoulder would be a starting point. This may work at the higher levels, but not at the lower or rec levels.

This year we suggested umpires start off the left shoulder with no runners on base. This helps to eliminate F4 from getting in your way and gives the umpire an unobstructed view of a play at 1B. From this position, there were no reported problems with umpires getting trapped outside or getting blocked out on a play.

__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 15, 2003, 01:52pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
Quote:
Originally posted by IRISHMAFIA
Maybe they should adopt ASA's new BU positioning with no runners on base. That would solve the problem.

[/B]
Was that supposed to be for FP, too?
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 15, 2003, 01:54pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
Quote:
Originally posted by oppool
Pretty much what the other have said BUT I would ask my partner "How the hell he got hung up on a bunt to 3rd". Now I can see and have had this happen on a bunt or slap situation down 1st base line and the BU stays in foul territory to make the call BUT down 1st base line he should of been in fair territory and able to take the runner to 2nd though he might get caught up where he has to stay outside instead of moving in to where I will take the runner to 3rd of there is a play.....


JMO's

Don
I wondered that also, but I figured you D1 guys do things differently.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 15, 2003, 03:44pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: north central Pa
Posts: 2,360
Mike,
I was under the impression that was strictly a SP mechanic. I have a couple of let's say "very experienced" guys in my high school chapter that should probably use this mechanic - since neither wants to retire and they still get games from the assignors.

Steve M
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 15, 2003, 04:27pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally posted by Steve M
Mike,
I was under the impression that was strictly a SP mechanic. I have a couple of let's say "very experienced" guys in my high school chapter that should probably use this mechanic - since neither wants to retire and they still get games from the assignors.

Steve M
It is. I failed to note SP in my post. I'll edit it.

However, I cannot figure out why it couldn't apply to FP. Can you?

__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:45am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1