The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Search Forums
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Showing results 1 to 5 of 5
Search took 0.00 seconds.
Search: Posts Made By: MJT
Forum: Football Sun Nov 02, 2008, 11:52pm
Replies: 13
Views: 1,346
Posted By MJT
True, but the fact is it does not meet the...

True, but the fact is it does not meet the definition of a shift, so it cannot be an illegal shift.

SECTION 39 SHIFT
A shift is the action of one or more offensive players who, after a huddle or...
Forum: Football Sun Nov 02, 2008, 04:35pm
Replies: 13
Views: 1,346
Posted By MJT
Well if that is what you are discussing, that is...

Well if that is what you are discussing, that is a classic example of IM cuz he is moving towards the LOS at the snap. It would not be a FS in this case. It would be a FS if he was going sideways, or...
Forum: Football Sun Nov 02, 2008, 04:09pm
Replies: 13
Views: 1,346
Posted By MJT
This would not be an illegal shift because of the...

This would not be an illegal shift because of the definition of a shift. See case play 7.2.7 for a similar explanation of the difference between IM and IS, similar to this play.
Forum: Football Sun Nov 02, 2008, 02:26pm
Replies: 13
Views: 1,346
Posted By MJT
Rut, I disagree cuz I don't think he missed the...

Rut,
I disagree cuz I don't think he missed the snap count, as he did not start to move (lean) until the receiver had been in motion for over 2 seconds. Now if he started his lean the very instant...
Forum: Football Sun Nov 02, 2008, 01:54pm
Replies: 13
Views: 1,346
Posted By MJT
That was a lean, and not a step (as there was in...

That was a lean, and not a step (as there was in the Texas - TTech game) so I'd have illegal motion on this play. The T -TTech play was called the way we have been instructed, as the RB took a step....
Showing results 1 to 5 of 5

 
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:50pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1