Forum: Basketball
Thu Jun 26, 2008, 02:12pm
|
|
Replies: 106
Views: 8,281
I agree
To OBTAIN LGP you have to have two feet on the floor facing the player, however when you move obliquely to MAINTAIN LGP are you still in their path?
|
|
Forum: Basketball
Thu Jun 26, 2008, 02:06pm
|
|
Replies: 106
Views: 8,281
Yeah,
That got lost in the noise. It was so far up in the thread I had to go back and look at it. I agree with you that it is a block. I've never said otherwise.
|
|
Forum: Basketball
Thu Jun 26, 2008, 01:52pm
|
|
Replies: 106
Views: 8,281
I don't disagree with an Airborne shooter
But what about a offensive player on the ground? You'll not find anywhere in the rule book (at least not to my memory) the phrase "re-establish" LGP. I agree that we have to call this a block for...
|
|
Forum: Basketball
Thu Jun 26, 2008, 01:08pm
|
|
Replies: 106
Views: 8,281
Are you saying....
Are you saying that anytime an offensive player changes direction, that the defender has lost LGP? If so, I don't agree. If A1 has the ball and B1 has OBTAINED LGP, when A1 moves to go around B1,...
|
|
Forum: Basketball
Thu Jun 26, 2008, 10:43am
|
|
Replies: 106
Views: 8,281
I agree that this goes beyond LGP and it is...
I agree that this goes beyond LGP and it is basic. I have a block. But what I can't understand is why we can't all agree that JR and Mark are asking two different questions.
Answer the...
|
|
Forum: Basketball
Thu Jun 26, 2008, 09:12am
|
|
Replies: 106
Views: 8,281
No, re-read Peter's response
JR's question may be broader, but Peter's response was more specific.
Peter specifically addressed the play where the player had NOT obtained LGP before A1 became airborne. Let me make it clear. ...
|
|
Forum: Basketball
Thu Jun 26, 2008, 08:42am
|
|
Replies: 106
Views: 8,281
Again, this is not what Mark is saying
You and Mark are asking two totally different questions. In Mark's scenario, the player had obtained LGP BEFORE A1 left the floor. You asked Peter...
.
In your question you don't specify if...
|
|
Forum: Basketball
Thu Jun 26, 2008, 07:51am
|
|
Replies: 106
Views: 8,281
That's not what Mark is saying
I don't agree with the Mark's ruling that this is a foul on A1, but I have to say that the above quote is not what Mark is talking about. B1 had obtained LGP before the player was airborne. He...
|
