The Official Forum > Search Forums Search Results

User Name Remember Me? Password

Showing results 1 to 4 of 4 Search took 0.00 seconds. Search: Posts Made By: RKBUmp

Forum: Softball Tue Apr 15, 2014, 01:35pm

Replies: 21 Seriously? Views: 2,151 Posted By RKBUmp Intersting that they appear to be going by some... Intersting that they appear to be going by some rule from an umpire school when the following is taken directly from the MLB rulebook posted on the MLB website.

Forum: Softball Tue Apr 15, 2014, 12:46pm

Replies: 21 Seriously? Views: 2,151 Posted By RKBUmp Did that happen to come from the same person who... Did that happen to come from the same person who wrote the NFHS courtesy runner interpretation over on the baseball board? :eek:

Forum: Softball Tue Apr 15, 2014, 11:40am

Replies: 21 Seriously? Views: 2,151 Posted By RKBUmp By that definition then, even if the catcher had... By that definition then, even if the catcher had controlled the ball with the throwing hand it should not be an out because control was not established until after he removed his foot from the base.

Forum: Softball Tue Apr 15, 2014, 11:23am

Replies: 21 Seriously? Views: 2,151 Posted By RKBUmp Certainly looks like a catch and a loss of the... Certainly looks like a catch and a loss of the ball on transfer to throwing hand to me. Saw another last week on a play at 2nd the ruled no catch. What is this definition in MLB? Havent seen it.

Showing results 1 to 4 of 4

Forum Jump User Control Panel Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home Baseball Basketball Football Softball General / Off-Topic Hockey Lacrosse Rugby Soccer Swimming/Diving Track & Field Volleyball Wrestling Feedback Testing Forum