Forum: Football
Tue Aug 28, 2007, 08:26am
|
|
Replies: 20
Views: 2,412
not exactly the same but close
case book 9.2.3 c read the rulings here. While not the same exact play, I would contend that the OP play would allow the defense even greater latitude. A can be blocked by B behind the NZ. This...
|
|
Forum: Football
Sun Aug 26, 2007, 11:29am
|
|
Replies: 20
Views: 2,412
|
|
Forum: Football
Fri Aug 24, 2007, 08:47pm
|
|
Replies: 20
Views: 2,412
since when
Granted I don't have my books with me. However, I don't recall any language in the rulebook that says that A must be a potential blocker before B can push them out of the way to get the ball. In...
|
|
Forum: Football
Fri Aug 24, 2007, 01:18pm
|
|
Replies: 20
Views: 2,412
what is the basis
Warren,
What is the basis for illegal use of hands? What difference does it make if the ball is in the air?
|
|
Forum: Football
Fri Aug 24, 2007, 11:22am
|
|
Replies: 20
Views: 2,412
what is illegal??
Mike,
I agree with you that it appears legal. What is Parry's problem with the play? As I recall the defense can use their hands to ward off the offensive players to get to the ball carrier. B...
|
