The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Search Forums
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Showing results 1 to 10 of 10
Search took 0.00 seconds.
Search: Posts Made By: Bob M.
Forum: Football Wed Sep 17, 2008, 12:42pm
Replies: 203
Views: 26,892
Posted By Bob M.
REPLY: Well, it's nice to know the officials got...

REPLY: Well, it's nice to know the officials got that one right, since it's a blatant violation of the illegal participation rule, which prohibits the offense from using substitutions or pretended...
Forum: Football Mon Apr 07, 2008, 02:00pm
Replies: 203
Views: 26,892
Posted By Bob M.
REPLY: I feel the same way. I should be flogged.:o

REPLY: I feel the same way. I should be flogged.:o
Forum: Football Mon Apr 07, 2008, 08:25am
Replies: 203
Views: 26,892
Posted By Bob M.
REPLY: No...the word "may" appears pretty clearly...

REPLY: No...the word "may" appears pretty clearly in my post. All that implies is that it's not necessary that the ball be kicked. But it still needs to be obvious that a kick may be attempted....
Forum: Football Fri Apr 04, 2008, 03:42pm
Replies: 203
Views: 26,892
Posted By Bob M.
REPLY: jtex...Let's make sure we understand what...

REPLY: jtex...Let's make sure we understand what the rules say about numbering:
1. There must be five players numbered 50-79 on the line of scrimmage at the snap. No "recommendation" there...it's a...
Forum: Football Mon Jan 28, 2008, 04:50pm
Replies: 203
Views: 26,892
Posted By Bob M.
REPLY: But since the A11 was not discussed in...

REPLY: But since the A11 was not discussed in full committee at last weekend's Rules Committee Meeting in Indianapolis (and that is a fact), there will be no mention of the A11 (for or against) in...
Forum: Football Mon Jan 28, 2008, 03:21pm
Replies: 203
Views: 26,892
Posted By Bob M.
REPLY: Might as well respond here too. Thanks for...

REPLY: Might as well respond here too. Thanks for the update. I agree that the offense is legal...for now, but I must take some exception to the way you represent its review and disposition.

You...
Forum: Football Mon Jan 28, 2008, 01:53pm
Replies: 203
Views: 26,892
Posted By Bob M.
REPLY: Based upon past history, you're exactly...

REPLY: Based upon past history, you're exactly right. But I would hope that they'd also change the rules to align with any such case play.
Forum: Football Mon Jan 28, 2008, 01:52pm
Replies: 203
Views: 26,892
Posted By Bob M.
REPLY: OK...so the game begins and after the...

REPLY: OK...so the game begins and after the opponents punt following a three-and-out, the A11 team trots eleven players numbered 1-49 or 80-99 onto the field. Nothing illegal about that. But begs...
Forum: Football Thu Jan 24, 2008, 08:05pm
Replies: 203
Views: 26,892
Posted By Bob M.
REPLY: I don't agree. If a player is not on the...

REPLY: I don't agree. If a player is not on the line between the ends, he's not operating under the exception. Nothing wrong with that. However, if he subsequently moves to a position on the line...
Forum: Football Tue Nov 20, 2007, 08:41pm
Replies: 203
Views: 26,892
Posted By Bob M.
REPLY: Mike...same as NCAA with one exception: It...

REPLY: Mike...same as NCAA with one exception: It is not required that "it be obvious that a kick might be made." Hence, if the QB lines up 8 yards deep in the gun on 1st and ten, it's still a SKF in...
Showing results 1 to 10 of 10

 
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:58pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1