Forum: Basketball
Thu Jan 27, 2011, 06:01pm
|
Replies: 57
Views: 3,889
You can't strictly justify double T's either...
You can't strictly justify double T's either because the first was not a technical. I think the intent in this situation is to treat the whole fiasco as one and not shoot if there an equal number of...
|
Forum: Basketball
Thu Jan 27, 2011, 05:52pm
|
Replies: 57
Views: 3,889
|
Forum: Basketball
Thu Jan 27, 2011, 02:59pm
|
Replies: 57
Views: 3,889
|
Forum: Basketball
Thu Jan 27, 2011, 02:44pm
|
Replies: 57
Views: 3,889
How did you rule? I think a double flagrant...
How did you rule? I think a double flagrant something or other is warranted for actively fighting players. If there is a disparity in the players fighting, all the penalty summary says is to award...
|
Forum: Basketball
Thu Jan 27, 2011, 02:13pm
|
Replies: 57
Views: 3,889
Not true.
4-18
Fighting is a flagrant...
Not true.
4-18
Fighting is a flagrant act and can occur when the ball is dead or live. Fighting
includes, but is not limited to combative acts such as:
ART. 1 . . . An attempt to strike,...
|
Forum: Basketball
Thu Jan 27, 2011, 02:03pm
|
Replies: 57
Views: 3,889
What about 4-19-4?
Also, 8.7 Situation A:
...
What about 4-19-4?
Also, 8.7 Situation A:
8.7 SITUATION A: A1 is attempting the second free throw of a two-shot foul.
While the second free throw is in flight, A2 and B1 punch each other...
|
Forum: Basketball
Thu Jan 27, 2011, 01:41pm
|
Replies: 57
Views: 3,889
|
Forum: Basketball
Thu Jan 27, 2011, 01:25pm
|
Replies: 57
Views: 3,889
|