The Official Forum
>
Search Forums
Search Results
User Name
Remember Me?
Password
Register
FAQ
Community
Calendar
Today's Posts
Search
Community Links
Social Groups
Pictures & Albums
Members List
Search Forums
Show Threads
Show Posts
Tag Search
Advanced Search
Go to Page...
Showing results 1 to 2 of 2
Search took
0.00
seconds.
Search:
Posts Made By:
Delaware Blue
Forum:
Baseball
Fri Apr 01, 2005, 04:10pm
Replies:
6
batter inferference
Views:
1,076
Posted By
Delaware Blue
I thought I said: If F2 does not retire the...
I thought I said:
If F2 does not retire the runner due to the BR interference, you would then declare the runner out for the BR's action.
I thought that ...due to the BR interference... was...
Forum:
Baseball
Fri Apr 01, 2005, 02:24pm
Replies:
6
batter inferference
Views:
1,076
Posted By
Delaware Blue
The correct answer is "false." If F2 retires the...
The correct answer is "false." If F2 retires the runner, that out stands so there is no need to automatically declare the runner out (the catcher got him despite the interference). If F2 does not...
Showing results 1 to 2 of 2
Forum Jump
User Control Panel
Private Messages
Subscriptions
Who's Online
Search Forums
Forums Home
Baseball
Basketball
Football
Softball
General / Off-Topic
Hockey
Lacrosse
Rugby
Soccer
Swimming/Diving
Track & Field
Volleyball
Wrestling
Feedback
Testing Forum
All times are GMT -5. The time now is
09:36am
.
The Official Forum
-
Archive
-
Top
Search Engine Friendly URLs by
vBSEO
3.3.0 RC1