Forum: Football
Fri Aug 21, 2009, 09:43am
|
Replies: 12
Views: 1,857
I would disagree that the language is...
I would disagree that the language is unimportant. The college rule should clearly state no initial contact with any part of the helmet.
How do you approach coach after you have made them aware...
|
Forum: Football
Thu Aug 20, 2009, 11:50am
|
Replies: 4
Views: 1,307
|
Forum: Football
Thu Aug 20, 2009, 10:37am
|
Replies: 4
Views: 1,307
Ramming; Thxs HLin NC & Thiery
I only read the rule and not the case study. I wish this was clearly stated in the rules and not in the case study.
This brings me to the definition of ramming. Where is ramming defined? Is...
|
Forum: Football
Thu Aug 20, 2009, 08:30am
|
Replies: 12
Views: 1,857
Ramming
Thank you. I only read the rule and not the case study. I wish this was clearly stated in the rules and not in the case study.
This brings me to the definition of ramming. Where is ramming...
|
Forum: Football
Wed Aug 19, 2009, 11:48pm
|
Replies: 12
Views: 1,857
|
Forum: Football
Wed Aug 19, 2009, 10:42pm
|
Replies: 12
Views: 1,857
|
Forum: Football
Wed Aug 19, 2009, 05:00pm
|
Replies: 12
Views: 1,857
Tackling
Some coaches teach to put the fasemask in the runner's chest. The NHFS has made the initiating contact with the face mask illegal; however, the College football rules does not explicitly have this...
|
Forum: Football
Mon Apr 14, 2008, 03:42pm
|
Replies: 203
Views: 31,936
Thanks for straighting me out on the forward...
Thanks for straighting me out on the forward pass. I thought a ball passed beyond the neutral zone was a forward pass because the NCAA rules on Pass Interference.
The interference rule says a...
|
Forum: Football
Fri Apr 11, 2008, 09:40am
|
Replies: 203
Views: 31,936
The current HS rules allows this. You must...
The current HS rules allows this. You must enforce the current rules whether you like them or not and let the rule committee determine the rules. Make your concerns known to the rules committee. ...
|
Forum: Football
Fri Apr 11, 2008, 09:25am
|
Replies: 203
Views: 31,936
thanks for clarifying for me.
I did not see...
thanks for clarifying for me.
I did not see "at least" in the 2007 NCAA rule I downloaded from the the NCAA website the other day. I just double checked the rules I copied. Here is the link to...
|
Forum: Football
Tue Apr 08, 2008, 01:30pm
|
Replies: 203
Views: 31,936
|
Forum: Football
Fri Apr 04, 2008, 11:05pm
|
Replies: 203
Views: 31,936
|
Forum: Football
Fri Apr 04, 2008, 04:09pm
|
Replies: 203
Views: 31,936
Sorry re-read your post more carefully.
...
Sorry re-read your post more carefully.
That's the point. Who says #50 cannot be the EMOL? He is then eligible for pass. The whole argument from several people on this particluar postings...
|
Forum: Football
Fri Apr 04, 2008, 04:01pm
|
Replies: 203
Views: 31,936
That is not correct.
Go and look at the...
That is not correct.
Go and look at the NCAA rules I posted.
1.4.1
1.4.2
7.1.3.a.4.c
You will see 1.4.1 states very clearly SRONGLY RECOMMEND. There is no way you can dispute that. I...
|
Forum: Football
Fri Apr 04, 2008, 02:54pm
|
Replies: 203
Views: 31,936
Player Numbering
I think this is very creative! I must applaud Coach Bryan and his staff's creativity!
It does bring out a few contridictions in the rules.
From the 2007 NCAA Rules:
Rule 1.4.1 states the...
|