The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Tue Aug 19, 2003, 09:13pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 45
Does anyone have the answers to these questions on the Part I exam? I'm stumped:
65 (I think there's a misprint on the test)
67
80
82
Thanks, guys!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Aug 19, 2003, 10:30pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,612
Yep, I've got'em!

65 should read 80-99. It's a typo. Answer it based on 80-99.
__________________
"...as cool as the other side of the pillow." - Stuart Scott

"You should never be proud of doing the right thing." - Dean Smith
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed Aug 20, 2003, 06:06am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 842
Send a message via AIM to cowbyfan1 Send a message via Yahoo to cowbyfan1
yeah 65 is a typo use 80-99
67 - won't give you an answer but what determine if a player is on the line or a back??
80 - look under possession and kicks..
82 - look under force, safety and touchback.

These are simple if you look in the rules book..
__________________
Jim

Need an out, get an out. Need a run, balk it in.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed Aug 20, 2003, 07:31am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 175
65-True 7-5-6a

67-False 2-30-3;7-2-3

80-False 6-1-5

82-True 2-13-3;8-5-1


Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed Aug 20, 2003, 09:06am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cheyenne, wyoming
Posts: 1,493
in 65 the numbering is of little consequence anyway the answer is the same.... or am I missing something... aren't interior linemen always ineligible recievers??
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed Aug 20, 2003, 11:54am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Clinton Township, NJ
Posts: 2,065
Quote:
Originally posted by cmathews
in 65 the numbering is of little consequence anyway the answer is the same.... or am I missing something... aren't interior linemen always ineligible recievers??
REPLY: Correct. The answer would be the same whether or not the typo was there.
__________________
Bob M.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Wed Aug 20, 2003, 02:18pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 58
#67

67 is a true definition of a QB, but not all A backs. That is what makes it false, correct?
__________________
Joel

Football is like life, it requires perseverance, self-denial, hard work, sacrifice, dedication and respect for authority.
--Vince Lombardi
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Wed Aug 20, 2003, 03:24pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 223
It's actually the definition of a lineman.
__________________
Steve
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:31am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1