Hit on Bengals punter
Dean Blandino, head of NFL officials, says hit on Kevin Huber was illegal - ESPN
What's the logic behind that rule? Logically to me, the punter would be just like any other player on the field once the ball's away. If not, he should be required to leave the field immediately after kicking it away. |
Quote:
The other protections that the NFL has come up with is due to the relative nature of the actual position, the relative scarcity and specialization of the position, and the advantage that would be bestowed to the opponent if they were given free leeway with unnecessary shots on that player. This is going to be your QB throughout a down and a kicker/punter throughout the kick and return. You lose a kicker or a punter, you've seriously hampered a team's special teams ability...especially since only 1 K and 1 P is carried on game day. Your last statement is silly. If a player is defenseless by the rule, it doesn't mean you can't contact him. It means he can't be hit above the shoulders with a helmet, forearm, or shoulder. They also can't be contacted in the body with any part of the crown of the helmet. They also can't be illegally launched into. I mean seriously...we've seen P/K light up all the team...and not in the head...that's still legal. |
Quote:
I completely understand the vulnerability of certain players in certain situations (defenseless receivers, punters/QBs in the kicking/throwing motion), but it seems like if they're going to be allowed the same level of participation in the play as everyone else, they should be subject to the same rules as everyone else, since at that point, they're not any more defenseless than any other player. It just seems like they're legislating something that the players/teams involved should be smart enough to avoid. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Even the Colts' punter more or less agrees with me. http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/10...-label-setback |
Well....if the Colts' punter has spoken, I guess the debate is over!
Just block them without hitting above the shoulders or launching and it's a non-issue. |
Quote:
I already gave you the logic behind the rule. You just don't like and/or agree with the reasoning. It's not a matter of the punter/kicker not wanting to get hit...the NFL doesn't want kickers/punters exposed to what is in their eyes is unnecessary (especially when what would happen if a team were to lose a kicker/punter during a game)...go ahead and blow him up...just don't hit him illegally. |
QBs and kickers/punters are in limited supply as fairly specialized role players.
Because these players are in more specialized roles, the other team tends to headhunt them more, intentionally seeking them out during plays like kick returns and interceptions to blow them up. The NFL is in the entertainment business. They've determined that this type of headhunting is detrimental to the product they put on the field. Ergo, they have chosen this method of extending further protection to these players so that their desired product is put on the field. If you'd like to suggest a rule change to the NFL as a concerned fan of the game, I'm sure there's a way to do that. As to officials, "Theirs not to reason why, theirs but to do and die" |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'm sorry we are unable to provide you with an answer that is satisfactory. If it makes you feel any better, this is a foul even if the player hit wasn't defenseless. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:40am. |