![]() |
Dpi??
Anyone else see the phantom DPI call at the start of the fourth quarter of the Steelers/Jets today? I've avoided any comments on the replacement officials' games, but am I missing something on that one?
|
Are you talking about the PI call on the Steelers #24 Taylor against Holmes on the second play of the 4th quarter?
|
No idea what the official saw there...Ike Taylor didn't even touch the receiver while the ball was in the air. In fact he barely contacted him at all during the entire play.
|
Not interference at any level.
A play or two later the white hat called a snap infraction "snap encroachment." What a clown circus. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/AQPjK2rkjus" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
|
Oh...my...
|
W...in that.....World?
Peace |
Quote:
Watching it live, I thought they were going to get him for leading with the helmet when I saw there was a flag (not that he did, but that seemed the only possibility). I thought the conference with the WH took a bit long, too. Then the announcement was made.... |
Quote:
|
These games with these officials are painful to watch. Too much on which to elaborate just....ouch!
|
Quote:
|
Wow.
The only possible foul #24 could have commited would be a hold during the route after the ball was in the air, but there's no evidence of that in the clip. And even if that were true, it didn't alter the receiver's route or keep him from getting to the ball. Double wow. |
There was a DPI call in Monday night's game that was just as bad. Hard to know what these guys think they're seeing.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:09pm. |