The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jul 06, 2003, 02:37pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 19
Thumbs up Coach convicted

Since many of you followed the threads concerning the coaches who assaulted a 19-year old football official in Palos Hills, Illinois last year, I figured I'd give you the epilogue: The State of Illinois, specifically the Cook County Court system DOES protect officials of organized sports contests.

Louis Trench, one of the coaches on trial, was found guilty in a bench trial on June 26, 2003 at the Hickory Hill's branch of Cook County courts. He will be sentenced at the same courthouse (Room 208) on July 30 at 10:30am. See the Daily Southtown Newspaper article by clicking the hyperlink below:

http://www.dailysouthtown.com/southt...th/271syt3.htm

Have a great season guys!



[Edited by jemoore on Jul 6th, 2003 at 02:40 PM]
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jul 10, 2003, 04:59am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 842
Send a message via AIM to cowbyfan1 Send a message via Yahoo to cowbyfan1
Thumbs up

One less overly inflated ego on the field.. all the better
__________________
Jim

Need an out, get an out. Need a run, balk it in.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jul 12, 2003, 06:23pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,305
The story really shows how screwed up some of the folks associated with that team are, especially the mom (who happens to be the wife of the defense attorney.) They say there was no contact when apparently all the judge had to do was look at the video and quickly rule there was contact.

Maybe someone familiar with the case can explain why he chose trial by judge? That is usually done by crooks who know they are guilty but hope to get off on some legal technicality. If there is any doubt about your guilt, you are usually better off going with a jury and hoping you can get at least 1 person to side with you.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jul 14, 2003, 02:05pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 31
Send a message via ICQ to stevegarbs Send a message via AIM to stevegarbs Send a message via Yahoo to stevegarbs
Angry No ban for coach

The coach believed he was innocent all along, perhaps that's why he chose the bench trial. I observed the trial in person and felt his attorney could have done a much better job than he did.

Also, the league has decided to NOT ban the coach in any fashion. They believe his program (he is also president and athletic director) will fold without him so they will not punish him any further.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jul 14, 2003, 02:10pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 710
Once again, eyewitness accounts turn out to be abjectly false. Maybe the supposed outrage was also based on faulty observation skills.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:59pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1