![]() |
|
|||
![]()
K is in kick formation (field goal). 4th/10 on Bs 15 yd line. K is in kick formation (field goal). 4th/10 on Bs 15 yd line. The snap is muffed by K2 and then as the ball is rolling around on the ground is kicked by K1, which goes through the uprights
I am partly guessing here, since no bible is handy. This is an illegal kick. 15 yards from the spot of the foul. Basic spot is the previous spot(loose ball enforcement), and the foul occurred behind the basic spot, so enforce from the spot of the foul. There is no score since it was not a legal kick. What I cannot remember is if it carries a Loss of Down penalty. If no Loss of down here is what I have: 15 yards from where ball was kicked, repeat fourth down. If Loss of down is included: 15 yards from where ball is kicked and B will take over 1st and 10. What do you think? Erick |
|
|||
![]() quote: You're ruling is pretty much on the money as far as penalty acceptance, but "B" may want to decline this penalty, here's why. You are correct in saying the penalty is enforced from the spot of the foul. We would mark off 15 yards and replay the down (no loss of down). "A" would then get another chance at making the field goal. If the penalty is declined, B would get the ball at the 20 yard line. When the ball is loose following an illegal kick it is treated as a fumble. An illegal kick cannot score a field goal since, in effect, it is not a kick at all, simply a loose ball. The results of the play are that a loose ball went out of the end zone. Since the force for the ball going into & out of the end zone was provided by A, it is a touchback and B's ball at the 20 yard line. This topic has been discussed on this board on a couple other occasions & this can be a somewhat tricky situation if you're not familiar with these rulings. |
|
|||
![]()
Thanks, Schmidt MJ
That was my point, was about the the touchback being it was forth down.... I'm new to this forum! I wanted to see if anybody picked up on that! I still learning myself but I feel this is a very important ruling...Thanks again, tpaul NJFOA |
|
|||
![]() quote: Larry, To answer your question, this would be a safety for 2 reasons. But first let me clarify your play. I think you meant to say that the "snap" was muffed by K, not the "punt" was muffed by K. Either way, I guess it still doesn't make any difference in the result. First, if R declines the penalty for illegal kicking it would be a safety because the snap put the ball in the endzone where it was declared dead in K's possession by going OOB. Second, if R accepts the penalty for illegal kicking it would be a safety because the all-but-one principle dictates that the spot of enforcement on a loose ball foul by the offense behind the basic spot is the spot of the foul. |
|
|||
![]()
the original play is a touchback, unless B accepts the penalty for As illegal kick. Than it
would be a replay of the down from the spot, of the illegal kick (end of the run) minus 15 yards. Now about that ref in California. That call took some guts. But he has the right to do that. |
|
|||
![]()
QUOTE:
the original play is a touchback, unless B accepts the penalty for As illegal kick. Than it would be a replay of the down from the spot, of the illegal kick (end of the run) minus 15 yards. Now about that ref in California. That call took some guts. But he has the right to do that. I couldn't disagree more. If I remember correctly the ball was already in K's end zone. The correct call should have been a safety - NOT a TD. If I had been the K coach I would have raised a heckuva stink when the referee did that. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|