The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 02, 2003, 04:59am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 38
NCAA Rules:

Clock is running on fourth down. The offense false starts. The penalty is enforced and the White Hat stops the clock and does not restart the clock until the inception of the next play. There was less than 50 seconds on the clock when the infraction happened.

Should the clock have been stopped?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 02, 2003, 07:36am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,305
You left out an important detail...the team that false started was ahead (but not by much.) The R obviously decided the FS may have been a deliberate attempt by Team A to get time run off the clock, i.e. they would get a new 25 second play clock so could run 25 seconds more off the game clock without playing a down. I think it was a good move on the R's part and under NCAA rules he has the authority to keep itstopped till the snap.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 02, 2003, 09:40am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 156
I agree with TXMike.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 02, 2003, 12:24pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 38
TxMike:

Thanks for the clarification on the game situation. As a referee, do you like being put in the situation of "divining" the intent of the player? Especially in a situation like this? By the way, I do think the R made the correct call.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 02, 2003, 12:45pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,305
Since I am a BJ first and a R 2d, I cut my teeth on making "intent" calls since in NCAA rules you have to rule on defensive player's intent when making pass interference calls. I don't want to say I "like" having to make that call but I do see it as a vital role for us to fill and one that allows us to be more than soul-less automatons who are just throwing flags in response to certain acts. I know I sure like having the flexibility as a R to start or stop the clock when I feel someone is illegally trying to use or conserve time. If that means I have to judge intent before doing so, well then, so be it.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 02, 2003, 01:16pm
JMN JMN is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 296
Husker,

Whether or not the R was making a judgement call on the "intent" of the foul, you've got to make this call. If not, B is placed at a disadvantage. Otherwise, A could just false start their way to victory!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 02, 2003, 07:39pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 465
Talking

Quote:
[i] If that means I have to judge intent before doing so, well then, so be it. [/B]
That's why they pay us (well most of us the "BIG BUCKS" . (if you work maryland youth ball you get the REALLY BIG BUCKS 8^)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:02pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1