|
|
|
Mon Nov 11, 2002, 02:15pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
I was visiting Illinois last week and I had the chance to catch a playoff game from the town I used to live in. Below is the play and the resulting call. It did not seem right to me, but I have only officiated football for two years and I wasn't quite sure when asked by others. Your response would be appreciated.
************************************************** ***** Team A has the ball on their 30 yard line. A1 sweeps right and is stripped by B1 (defensive back). B1 heads for his goal line running by the sideline. Team A player hits B1 at about the 2 yard line. The ball pops out of B1's hand and goes through the back of the end zone without anyone in possesion of the ball. The white hat signaled a touch back and put the ball on the 20 yard line. (Here is the question part of the play) He gave the ball back to Team A on the 20 yard line. Now I can understand the touchback and placing the ball on the 20 but shouldn't Team B have gotten the ball? ************************************************** *****
__________________
R.Vietti 
|
|
Mon Nov 11, 2002, 02:51pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
Nope. Think of the same play, only A is on the 5 and A1 fumbles through the end zone and over the end line. You wouldn't give it back to A at the 20 and say, "here - try again". Fumbling into the end zone and having it recovered by the opponent or having it go OB or over the end line results in a touchback and it's the other teams ball. Kind of a big disincentive for fumbling into the endzone.
|
|
Mon Nov 11, 2002, 03:51pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks - That makes a lot of sense.
__________________
R.Vietti
|
|
Mon Nov 11, 2002, 04:01pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
At the time of the fumble the ball is in player and team possession of B. It remains in team possession of B as it crosses the endline of B's end zone. Therefore, it is a touchback. If the ball had not been possessed by B and had bounded into the end zone and over the endline it would have been a safety.
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
