The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 05, 2011, 07:00pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,262
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichMSN View Post
I'm not sure anyone would've blinked at a loss of yardage if this happened at midfield. Why should the end zone be any different? If he broke the tackle (and he did), then I'll let him gain yards, but I'll also let him lose yards and/or fumble.

I like the window sill analogy, but I don't think it applies here since the tackle was broken.
I would have, especially after watching the slow motion replay they showed during the game. He didn't break the tackle, the defender still had him by the legs when the second group of defenders engaged him.

I think it was a defensible, but ultimately wrong, call (but as I said, I'm biased).

I also thought the wing hurt himself by conferring with the R. What possible information does the R have that affects the call on forward momentum? It looked like the wing was confused as to what happened.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 07, 2011, 09:45am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eastshire View Post
I would have, especially after watching the slow motion replay they showed during the game. He didn't break the tackle, the defender still had him by the legs when the second group of defenders engaged him.
.
with new link - video.

you can clearly see he breaks the tackle 2:49. then 2nd tackle.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 07, 2011, 09:49am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,262
Quote:
Originally Posted by football-1 View Post
with new link - video.

you can clearly see he breaks the tackle 2:49. then 2nd tackle.
Yeap, sure does. I'd only seen the reverse of this angle before.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 07, 2011, 11:50am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Randolph, NJ
Posts: 1,936
Send a message via Yahoo to waltjp
Quote:
Originally Posted by football-1 View Post
with new link - video.

you can clearly see he breaks the tackle 2:49. then 2nd tackle.
What's your point - the safety was the correct call?

How far back does a runner have to be pushed while being controlled by the defender before the whistle is blown? The point that the runner broke free 2-yards deep in the end zone is irrelevant. His forward progress was stopped at the 2-yard line.

Horrible, horrible call - and the LJ knew it. He had the play stopped at the 2-yard line and started to come in with his hand raised, taking no fewer than 8 steps toward the middle of the field before dropping his hand and acquiescing to the H and R.
__________________
I got a fever! And the only prescription.. is more cowbell!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Safety or No Safety that is the question BrasoFuerte Football 14 Sun Sep 02, 2007 05:15pm
Sugar Bowl Officials irefky Football 3 Tue Jan 03, 2006 10:37pm
TD or Safety? chiefgil Football 3 Mon Dec 06, 2004 09:01am
Sugar Coating footlocker Basketball 25 Wed Feb 25, 2004 11:24am
Sugar Bowl Umpire hab_in_exile Football 3 Wed Jan 07, 2004 09:31pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:40pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1