![]() |
Pittsburg/Miami Fumble
After watching the clip of this play several times, it appears to me that the correct call should have been an inadvertant whistle which in the end would still award the ball to Pittsburg. Watching the clip you can see the linesman coming in indicating a touchdown and I'm sure blowing his whistle, when the reverse view shows the ball is out and has been recovered yet.
Saying we don't know who recovered the ball only makes me think that they decided to say that instead of IW, because why would the officials all stop doing their job unless they also heard the whistle and saw the touchdown signal? Also, I believe the NFL has a rule about fumbling forward especially into the end zone (the Snake from Oakland rule). I'm not sure if this rule applies here because I don't know all the details that goes alone with this rule...does anyone know the rule and if it would have applied to this play? BTW, I don't have a dog in the race...did not care who won but the rules interpretation of this play interests me. |
If the play would have happened under the two minute warning or was a fourth down play/try, then the fumbler is the only Team A member who would of been allowed to recover and advance ball. If another player on team A would of recovered the ball, it would revert back to the spot of the fumble or the recovery spot, whichever is worse. As the play occurred outside the two minute warning and was not on fourth down/a try, then a recovery by the Steelers would of resulted in a touchdown.
The rule about fumbling forward says that if the ball is fumbled forward and out of fumbles, it reverts back to the spot of the fumble. Also, aside from the officials erroneously saying the ball crossed the plane of the endzone, the play was handled correctly. http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=5726781 |
Had another "early" whistle in Monday night's game. Ball popped out and the defense recovered.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
How many times have you seen the ball given back to the fumbling team because the officials had no idea who had the ball when it became dead?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Because he was wrong. The ball was loose, it wasn't a TD and he shouldn't have blown. Whether it was an IW or not under NFL rules, I don't know. But that is pretty much the way it was treated. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
The problem is that the Replay System requires indisputable visual evidence to award the ball.
I remember Mike Pereira on officials review talking about the change that allowed more fumbles to be reviewed and he was clear that there was no way they were going to use Instant Replay to award possession in a scrum situation. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:56pm. |