The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Football (https://forum.officiating.com/football/)
-   -   Black pants question for umpires (https://forum.officiating.com/football/54934-black-pants-question-umpires.html)

FTVMartin Wed Oct 07, 2009 07:58pm

Black pants question for umpires
 
Just got my black pants and was thinking they would look good with a black towel instead of a white one. Any thoughts?

Also, I see that Honigs is now selling black ball flags. I wonder if black beanbags will be next.

johnnyg08 Wed Oct 07, 2009 08:09pm

yeah, i would say a black towel would be better than looking like a skunk...our state won't let us wear them yet though.

Reffing Rev. Wed Oct 07, 2009 09:19pm

So football officials have now gone from being fashion police to being fashion conscious.

bossman72 Wed Oct 07, 2009 09:34pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by FTVMartin (Post 629531)
Just got my black pants and was thinking they would look good with a black towel instead of a white one. Any thoughts?

Also, I see that Honigs is now selling black ball flags. I wonder if black beanbags will be next.

The black (and white) balled flags are so you don't have to tape them anymore.

But yeah, go for a black towel. Might look good!

jaybird Wed Oct 07, 2009 10:08pm

Quote:

I wonder if black beanbags will be next.
We already use black bean bags.

JRutledge Wed Oct 07, 2009 10:21pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by FTVMartin (Post 629531)
Just got my black pants and was thinking they would look good with a black towel instead of a white one. Any thoughts?

Also, I see that Honigs is now selling black ball flags. I wonder if black beanbags will be next.

The bean bags would not serve the same purpose as the flags with the black covering on the tip.

Peace

InsideTheStripe Wed Oct 07, 2009 10:23pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by jaybird (Post 629565)
We already use black bean bags.

Why?

Are they easier to see on the fields on which you officiate?

jaybird Wed Oct 07, 2009 10:24pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 629567)
The bean bags would not serve the same purpose as the flags with the black covering on the tip.

Peace

Sure they would. Both would match the color of the pants thus blending in instead of standing out.

JRutledge Wed Oct 07, 2009 10:34pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by jaybird (Post 629570)
Sure they would. Both would match the color of the pants thus blending in instead of standing out.

Bean bags are not used for penalties. No one cares if you reach for a bean bag.

Peace

InsideTheStripe Wed Oct 07, 2009 10:44pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 629572)
Bean bags are not used for penalties. No one cares if you reach for a bean bag.

At least Jeff and I can agree on one thing.

;)

LDUB Thu Oct 08, 2009 12:08am

Quote:

Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 629572)
Bean bags are not used for penalties. No one cares if you reach for a bean bag.

Peace

You're assuming that everyone uses the black flags because they don't want to be seen reaching for it. I'm sure some use them because they like the look of them blending in with the pants. And I could see a situation coming up with a fumble where the official reaches for the beanbag but then rules that there was not a fumble.

And I don't think it would take too long for teams to realize that the white ball sticking out of your pants is the flag; it isn't some big secret.

JRutledge Thu Oct 08, 2009 12:55am

Quote:

Originally Posted by LDUB (Post 629582)
You're assuming that everyone uses the black flags because they don't want to be seen reaching for it. I'm sure some use them because they like the look of them blending in with the pants. And I could see a situation coming up with a fumble where the official reaches for the beanbag but then rules that there was not a fumble.

And I don't think it would take too long for teams to realize that the white ball sticking out of your pants is the flag; it isn't some big secret.

Assuming?

The reason those flags were created were to blend into the color of the pants. This was the reason for the white tipped flag in the first place. Before the white tipped flags, many official would put white tape on the ball portion of the flag so if they reached for their flag (if in their belt) it would not be as obvious as when you would reach for a yellow object. And this is also the reason the flags are suggested in many parts of the country to have them in your belt. It is not as obvious if you reach for your flag and then change your mind what sometimes happens. And no one made these flags with the black on them until the black pants were made available. That is the actually reason the flags were manufactured the way they were, not based on an assumption I am making.

Peace

LDUB Thu Oct 08, 2009 01:31am

Quote:

Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 629584)
Assuming?

The reason those flags were created were to blend into the color of the pants. This was the reason for the white tipped flag in the first place. Before the white tipped flags, many official would put white tape on the ball portion of the flag so if they reached for their flag (if in their belt) it would not be as obvious as when you would reach for a yellow object. And this is also the reason the flags are suggested in many parts of the country to have them in your belt. It is not as obvious if you reach for your flag and then change your mind what sometimes happens. And no one made these flags with the black on them until the black pants were made available. That is the actually reason the flags were manufactured the way they were, not based on an assumption I am making.

Peace

So that is why they were made that way. And you are sure that every person who has one of those flags bought it because of that specific reason.

What if I told you that I worked with an official in a youth game wearing white shorts using a flag with a black ball? Obviously he is not using that flag so that it blends in with his shorts. Maybe he likes that the black flag does not show dirt on the ball portion as easily as a white or yellow one. Maybe black is his favorite color. There seem to be a lot of reasons why people could want a black or white flag. You can assume that each one of them bought the flag so that they won't be seen reaching for the yellow and I will assume that at least 1 of those flags were sold for a different reason.

And if reaching for your flag is such a big deal why don't you just not reach for it unless you are going to call a foul?

Rich Thu Oct 08, 2009 04:46am

Quote:

Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 629584)
Assuming?

The reason those flags were created were to blend into the color of the pants. This was the reason for the white tipped flag in the first place. Before the white tipped flags, many official would put white tape on the ball portion of the flag so if they reached for their flag (if in their belt) it would not be as obvious as when you would reach for a yellow object. And this is also the reason the flags are suggested in many parts of the country to have them in your belt. It is not as obvious if you reach for your flag and then change your mind what sometimes happens. And no one made these flags with the black on them until the black pants were made available. That is the actually reason the flags were manufactured the way they were, not based on an assumption I am making.

Peace

Wow. I guess I've been doing it all wrong all these years. I mean, I just figured the coaches *knew* I carried flags and didn't have to hide them.

It will be a cold day in you-know-where before I tape a flag or buy one with a ball any color other than yellow. (Unless I ever move up and then I'll do whatever they tell me to do, of course.)

mbyron Thu Oct 08, 2009 06:31am

Quote:

Originally Posted by InsideTheStripe (Post 629574)
At least Jeff and I can agree on one thing.

;)

Oh, now you've done it. Look for a post that says "I never said I agreed with you..." :rolleyes:

Jim D. Thu Oct 08, 2009 08:04am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reffing Rev. (Post 629552)
So football officials have now gone from being fashion police to being fashion conscious.

No, it they were fashion conscious they would not wear shorts, black pants or adjustable caps.

Ref Ump Welsch Thu Oct 08, 2009 08:23am

Quote:

Originally Posted by FTVMartin (Post 629531)
Just got my black pants and was thinking they would look good with a black towel instead of a white one. Any thoughts?

Also, I see that Honigs is now selling black ball flags. I wonder if black beanbags will be next.

Our white hat got one of those. One of my crew members asked if he had to check the skin color box for that. Wow. :o

JRutledge Thu Oct 08, 2009 08:57am

Quote:

Originally Posted by LDUB (Post 629585)
So that is why they were made that way. And you are sure that every person who has one of those flags bought it because of that specific reason.

What if I told you that I worked with an official in a youth game wearing white shorts using a flag with a black ball? Obviously he is not using that flag so that it blends in with his shorts. Maybe he likes that the black flag does not show dirt on the ball portion as easily as a white or yellow one. Maybe black is his favorite color. There seem to be a lot of reasons why people could want a black or white flag. You can assume that each one of them bought the flag so that they won't be seen reaching for the yellow and I will assume that at least 1 of those flags were sold for a different reason.

And if reaching for your flag is such a big deal why don't you just not reach for it unless you are going to call a foul?

First mistake is you are talking about a youth game in the context of this discussion. :D

Secondly, the point I was making was this was the reason the product was produced a certain way. Not only is that what I know, but what I was told by the people that sold them directly to me when I purchased my black flags back in August of this year.

And I did not say it was a big deal for everyone, just giving the reason why something was made. But there have been many incidences that someone judges a call by looking at the officials. This is one reason I have been always told to wear it in my belt in the front and not in a back pocket or behind your back. And I can think of several instances where an official reached for a flag and the fact they did not call a foul made SportsCenter or simply was a big topic during a broadcast. The Maryland-Northern Illinois game is one of the biggest situations that came to mind several years ago.

Peace

JRutledge Thu Oct 08, 2009 08:59am

No one asked you to.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichMSN (Post 629592)
Wow. I guess I've been doing it all wrong all these years. I mean, I just figured the coaches *knew* I carried flags and didn't have to hide them.

It will be a cold day in you-know-where before I tape a flag or buy one with a ball any color other than yellow. (Unless I ever move up and then I'll do whatever they tell me to do, of course.)

You know Rich, we all do not do the same things. It is OK. ;)

Peace

Rich Thu Oct 08, 2009 01:49pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim D. (Post 629608)
No, it they were fashion conscious they would not wear shorts, black pants or adjustable caps.

Or knickers. Knickers, in general, are ghastly. Just cause we've worn them for years doesn't change that.

mbyron Thu Oct 08, 2009 01:53pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by RichMSN (Post 629673)
Or knickers. Knickers, in general, are ghastly. Just cause we've worn them for years doesn't change that.

I heard a white hat a few weeks ago pining for stirrups in lieu of the one-piece socks.

Rich Thu Oct 08, 2009 02:21pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by mbyron (Post 629676)
I heard a white hat a few weeks ago pining for stirrups in lieu of the one-piece socks.

I don't disagree, actually. One piece socks are hard to clean and don't last very long (at least for me, mainly cause I want them WHITE) -- something that would be easier with nylon stirrups worn with sanitaries.

LDUB Thu Oct 08, 2009 10:26pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by mbyron (Post 629676)
I heard a white hat a few weeks ago pining for stirrups in lieu of the one-piece socks.

Stirrups are way nicer than one piece socks. If the stirrup look is not wanted the bottom portion of the stirrup could be made white instead of black.

Rich Thu Oct 08, 2009 11:07pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by LDUB (Post 629767)
Stirrups are way nicer than one piece socks. If the stirrup look is not wanted the bottom portion of the stirrup could be made white instead of black.

All black socks wouldn't look bad, either.

I like working with very white knickers, socks, and a white hat.

umpirebob71 Thu Oct 08, 2009 11:36pm

Hold on here. On one post, you describe knickers as "ghastly." On another, you say you "...like working with very white knickers..." I'm a little confused.

LDUB Thu Oct 08, 2009 11:38pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by umpirebob71 (Post 629797)
Hold on here. On one post, you describe knickers as "ghastly." On another, you say you "...like working with very white knickers..." I'm a little confused.

He doesn't like knickers. He has to wear them. He likes his knickers to be very white.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:28pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1