The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Football (https://forum.officiating.com/football/)
-   -   Utah Utes Line Shift (https://forum.officiating.com/football/50670-utah-utes-line-shift.html)

Spence Sat Jan 03, 2009 10:46am

Utah Utes Line Shift
 
Surely someone saw the Utah Bama game where Utah had a 4th and 1. I was at a bar so I couldn't hear any explanations given. The qb was under center with the o-linemen in a 2 pt stance. At the same time all of the o-linemen "shifted" inside causing Bama to jump offsides. Again, I couldn't hear any explanation but the flag was thrown against Utah.

What was illegal?

OverAndBack Sat Jan 03, 2009 10:53am

Did they simulate action at the snap?

Spence Sat Jan 03, 2009 10:57am

Quote:

Originally Posted by OverAndBack (Post 563888)
Did they simulate action at the snap?

Is that rhetorical or are you asking?

What is the definition of simulating action? They certainly shifted "hard" which I guess could be a simulation of action.

co2ice Sat Jan 03, 2009 11:15am

I saw the game and still never understood why the penality was called, I dont officiate football but would like to know why a shift is permitted in some instances and not others????? Utes Deserve strong consideration for #1 after that victory IMOHO!!

Rich Sat Jan 03, 2009 11:27am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spence (Post 563885)
Surely someone saw the Utah Bama game where Utah had a 4th and 1. I was at a bar so I couldn't hear any explanations given. The qb was under center with the o-linemen in a 2 pt stance. At the same time all of the o-linemen "shifted" inside causing Bama to jump offsides. Again, I couldn't hear any explanation but the flag was thrown against Utah.

What was illegal?

What was the purpose of everyone shifting?

To the officials and the defense it was too much like simulating a snap. False start.

Spence Sat Jan 03, 2009 12:13pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by RichMSN (Post 563902)
What was the purpose of everyone shifting?

To the officials and the defense it was too much like simulating a snap. False start.

I'm not a football official so let me ask this. Would it be illegal in and of itself for an o-lineman in a 2 pt stance to shift one step in towards the center?

waltjp Sat Jan 03, 2009 01:05pm

I didn't see the play in question so this is a generic description of the foul.

It was 4th and 1. The line was in a two-point stance and then shifted 'hard' into a three-point stance. If they hadn't used this type of shift at any other point in the game it's easy to surmise that the only reason for employing it in this situation was to draw the defense off-sides. If that's the case then Utah should have called for the false start.

PSU213 Sat Jan 03, 2009 01:12pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spence (Post 563885)
Surely someone saw the Utah Bama game where Utah had a 4th and 1. I was at a bar so I couldn't hear any explanations given. The qb was under center with the o-linemen in a 2 pt stance. At the same time all of the o-linemen "shifted" inside causing Bama to jump offsides. Again, I couldn't hear any explanation but the flag was thrown against Utah.

What was illegal?

Also, part of this may have had to do with whether the did this 'every play' or did they just do it on a 4th and short situation. This probably entered into the official's decision on whether this was meant to draw the defense off sides.

LDUB Sat Jan 03, 2009 02:33pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spence (Post 563914)
I'm not a football official so let me ask this. Would it be illegal in and of itself for an o-lineman in a 2 pt stance to shift one step in towards the center?

Yes they can shift, but there are restrictions. Read below.

"A false start occurs if a player commits a shift or feigned charge simulating action at the snap, if any player’s act is clearly intended to cause the defender(s) to encroach....If the offensive team executes a shift in such a manner that simulates action at the snap, the foul is a false start and not an illegal shift... When linemen or backs initially set in an upright position or hands-on-knees position and then drop into a three- or four-point stance for their final position, the action results in a false start if it is done in a manner that simulates action at the snap. Such action must be slow and deliberate."

MJT Sat Jan 03, 2009 03:15pm

I was definitely the correct call, and an easy one at that. They could have got the QB for a head bob, (which it was big time) and the entire line moved very abruptly, simulating the snap. Easy, and correct call at any level of FB.

I DVR'd the play. It is interesting that as the H goes back to his sideline and it is now 4-1 (2:19 on the clock) the head coach comes over and has a conversation with him. They actually show a closeup of them and he appears to be telling him what they are going to do. That call was an absolute no brainer call for a FS. The coach knew he was trying to pull a fast one, and that is why he tried to tell the official. Just cuz he does that does not mean the call will go his way. I'm sure the H went back to him and said, there is no other way we can call that but a FS. He is going to complain, but he knows he is technically fouling with what they are doing, he is just hoping the call will go there way.

BTW, this was the only time all game that they did this "shift." It was 4-1 with just over 2 minutes til 1/2 time, on the 45 yard line, and the shift was very abrupt and obvious. Even the talking heads said "that was a designed play to try and draw Alabama offsides... a sudden move by the offense to try to draw the defense offsides."

MJT Sat Jan 03, 2009 03:17pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by co2ice (Post 563895)
I saw the game and still never understood why the penality was called, I dont officiate football but would like to know why a shift is permitted in some instances and not others????? Utes Deserve strong consideration for #1 after that victory IMOHO!!

Humm, a fan (from Utah) saying "I don't know why a shift is permitted in some instances and not others" when the call (and the correct call) went against his team. :eek: :rolleyes: ;);)

MJT Sat Jan 03, 2009 03:21pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spence (Post 563914)
I'm not a football official so let me ask this. Would it be illegal in and of itself for an o-lineman in a 2 pt stance to shift one step in towards the center?

Not IF he did not have a hand near the ground AND did so in a slow and deliberate manner. That is not what happened.

Theisey Sat Jan 03, 2009 04:12pm

What bothered me about that play was did they (Utah) ever do this during the regular season AND get away with it?? No question, I had my hankie flying at my TV as soon as I saw the play unfold. Classic attempt to draw in defense over.

AZ Line Judge Sat Jan 03, 2009 04:57pm

Definitely Illegal
 
I have watched Utah all year, and I haven't seen them do this.

It was definitely designed to draw the defense off-sides.

Easy call!

grantsrc Sat Jan 03, 2009 08:17pm

I called this once this year in a HS game and got grilled by the HC. I asked him, why did your line shift that way? Not sure I ever got an answer....

waltjp Sat Jan 03, 2009 09:51pm

I also flagged this action in a HS game this year. Turns out our cadet instructor was in the stands watching the game. His son, who is also on his football crew, teaches at the home school.

After the game he contacted me and let me know that it was a good call and he planned on sharing the story with his class of cadets.

OverAndBack Sun Jan 04, 2009 12:37am

Quote:

Originally Posted by MJT (Post 563975)
Humm, a fan (from Utah) saying "I don't know why a shift is permitted in some instances and not others" when the call (and the correct call) went against his team. :eek: :rolleyes: ;);)


Not to mention "Utes Deserve strong consideration for #1 after that victory IMOHO!!!!"

mbyron Sun Jan 04, 2009 10:11am

The Utah HC was pissed at the call, but it was clearly designed to make the defense encroach. LDUB has cited the correct rules reference (though you might have cited the source, Luke).

Good call.

OverAndBack Sun Jan 04, 2009 11:49am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spence (Post 563889)
Is that rhetorical or are you asking?

I'm asking. Because I didn't see it.

Quote:

What is the definition of simulating action? They certainly shifted "hard" which I guess could be a simulation of action.
It's like porn. You may not be able to define it, but you know it when you see it.

ajmc Sun Jan 04, 2009 12:00pm

As we all know, what's planned, designed, practiced and beaten into the minds of players isn't what is always executed during a game. It really doesn't matter what the coaches believe satisfies the rule requirements, it's entirely dependent on what the covering official believes, and actually sees.

When teams design something to run so close to the line defining legal from illegal, PRESUMING it's OK, they have to accept the risk that their calculations may not fall on the same side of that line as the covering official's.

bossman72 Sun Jan 04, 2009 12:39pm

Was the play similar to this one:

YouTube - LSU Football - Silly 4th Down vs Bama

jaybird Sun Jan 04, 2009 07:45pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by bossman72 (Post 564215)
Was the play similar to this one:

YouTube - LSU Football - Silly 4th Down vs Bama

Yep

Forksref Sun Jan 04, 2009 08:57pm

I saw it and I agree with the call. Good job by the officials.

ChickenOfNC Mon Jan 05, 2009 02:01pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by grantsrc (Post 564039)
I called this once this year in a HS game and got grilled by the HC. I asked him, why did your line shift that way? Not sure I ever got an answer....

That's funny. Nearly the same thing happened to me:

After flagging his team for false start, the coach went ballistic. I finally asked the coach what his intent was in having them shift so abruptly, and his response was "to draw the defense offsides". I advised him that was the end of our discussion.

OverAndBack Mon Jan 05, 2009 02:17pm

Coach, this is your own petard. Enjoy.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:59am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1