The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Football (https://forum.officiating.com/football/)
-   -   Louisville vs UCONN game (https://forum.officiating.com/football/38990-louisville-vs-uconn-game.html)

tgav Fri Oct 19, 2007 09:31pm

Louisville vs UCONN game
 
Lots of ugliness in this game

- Invalid fair catch signal resulting in a TD,
- Punt appears to touch B, A recovers, ref gives ball to B at S.O.F.T..

these guys should be playing playing golf next Saturday!

Been away from the ref game for a few years, glad to see not a whole lot has changed!

Tim

jimpiano Fri Oct 19, 2007 10:22pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by tgav
Lots of ugliness in this game

- Invalid fair catch signal resulting in a TD,
- Punt appears to touch B, A recovers, ref gives ball to B at S.O.F.T..

these guys should be playing playing golf next Saturday!

Been away from the ref game for a few years, glad to see not a whole lot has changed!

Tim

I am not sure about the fair catch signal.....but the silence on this board to the question may indicate the officials were wrong, at least as to how TV saw it.

On the punt,,,I think the kicking team touched the ball first.
But, again, silence here is telling.

Welpe Fri Oct 19, 2007 11:54pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimpiano
I am not sure about the fair catch signal.....but the silence on this board to the question may indicate the officials were wrong, at least as to how TV saw it.

On the punt,,,I think the kicking team touched the ball first.
But, again, silence here is telling.

It's Friday night, most officials that post on this board are probably working. ;)

JasonTX Sat Oct 20, 2007 12:32am

That is correct. Friday night is football game night for most of us. Just got back myself. I'm sure when we see the replays of the play in question we'll give our opinion.

Adam Sat Oct 20, 2007 12:40am

Quote:

Originally Posted by tgav
these guys should be playing playing golf next Saturday!

Been away from the ref game for a few years,

There's a shocker.

TXMike Sat Oct 20, 2007 03:52am

Looked like a clear invalid fair catch signal to me. It was invalid but still has the effect of the valid one in that ball should be dead when possessed. Maybe we will hear from Big East this week as there will be considerable media play on this. Replay rules do not specifically cover fair catches but 1 category of reviewable plays seems applicable: "A runner judged not to be down by rule"

The video:
http://www.youtube.com/v/rbRdZZ1kfag

tgav Sat Oct 20, 2007 07:31am

Help me out here, in a 7 man game B, has receiver, F and/or S has blockers in front of ball and amongst other things, the receiver, to make sure receiver doesn't block after a valid/invalid signal, right?

Proper call should have been, dead ball at spot of recovery, 5 yds for invalid signal and 5 yd delay of game?

JasonTX Sat Oct 20, 2007 01:34pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by tgav
Help me out here, in a 7 man game B, has receiver, F and/or S has blockers in front of ball and amongst other things, the receiver, to make sure receiver doesn't block after a valid/invalid signal, right?

Proper call should have been, dead ball at spot of recovery, 5 yds for invalid signal and 5 yd delay of game?

That crew might get hammered for missing the signal, but I can guarantee you they'd get hammered even worse if they enforced a 5 yd. penalty for an invalid signal. That is not a foul under NCAA rules.

BktBallRef Sat Oct 20, 2007 05:55pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimpiano
I am not sure about the fair catch signal.....but the silence on this board to the question may indicate the officials were wrong, at least as to how TV saw it.

On the punt,,,I think the kicking team touched the ball first.
But, again, silence here is telling.

That's a dumb assumption.

Most are working on Fridya night.

Most will not see a Friday night TV game.

I guess we're supposed to reply anyway?

sj Sat Oct 20, 2007 10:57pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by tgav
]Proper call should have been, dead ball at spot of recovery, 5 yds for invalid signal and 5 yd delay of game?


Nope. But you can try again.

DJ_NV Sat Oct 20, 2007 11:27pm

NCAA: There is no foul for an invalid FC signal. Is this a delay of game foul by B? Technically, yes (6-5-2). However in practice, this covering official should almost never have a flag for this as he should be clearly killing the play after the catch/recovery.

Robert Goodman Sun Oct 21, 2007 01:04am

Quote:

Originally Posted by JasonTX
That crew might get hammered for missing the signal, but I can guarantee you they'd get hammered even worse if they enforced a 5 yd. penalty for an invalid signal. That is not a foul under NCAA rules.

There was a time NCAA had separate provisions for "invalid" and "illegal" FCS.

jimpiano Sun Oct 21, 2007 09:18am

Quote:

Originally Posted by JasonTX
That crew might get hammered for missing the signal, but I can guarantee you they'd get hammered even worse if they enforced a 5 yd. penalty for an invalid signal. That is not a foul under NCAA rules.


So what should have happened?

TXMike Sun Oct 21, 2007 09:25am

Someone should have seen the invalid FC signal and that someone should have blown a whistle as soon as he saw the returner had possession. If the returner had continued to try to advance (even though ball was dead), ball should be taken to where he took possession and the receivers penalized 5 yards from there for delay of game.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:16am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1