![]() |
|
|
|||
Crackback is a matter of semantics, much like "cut block". Coaching terminology should not be misconstrued as the rules of football but unfortunately they are sometimes.
So far as the "not giving the defneder time to turn" sounds like either someone BS'ing his way out of quoting the rule or trying to get rid of a coach quickly. |
|
|||
Had a team run a play where a wide-out, who was lined up on the LOS went in motion and cracked the end. Called Illegal Motion as the wide-out must be 5yrds back at the snap if he started on the LOS and is in motion. Is this a correct call?
Coach then asked if the wide-out, starting on the line, stepped back and stopped, then went in motion, could he block the end. Fine, as long as it is a legal block? |
|
|||
You are correct. In the first situation, the wide out was guilty of illegal motion. If he shifts to a position in the backfield and there are still seven on the line, he is free to go in motion after he has been set for a second. He can the block legally anyone he wants to.
|
|
|||
If you want to seriously talk rules, get the term "crackback" out of your vocabulary. It is not to be found in NFHS rules. All the normal definitions regarding blocking apply here.
After a game last week, I had a parent ask me if "chop" blocks are legal. After talking to him, I found out that he meant blocks below the waist. I explained to him the legalities of blocks below the waist in the free blocking zone, etc. I wish ESPN would do a show on rules so the average Joe can better understand them. Terminology would be a good place to start. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
crackback blocks | Biscuit | Football | 11 | Mon Aug 29, 2005 09:24pm |
Block or no block | Coach12 | Softball | 17 | Tue Jul 05, 2005 05:48pm |
difference between cut block and chop block | ase | Football | 7 | Mon Nov 29, 2004 11:23am |
P.C. or Block | Teddly | Basketball | 5 | Sat Dec 20, 2003 06:23pm |
Crackback block | lawref | Football | 10 | Wed Aug 27, 2003 11:57am |