The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 18, 2001, 09:59pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 156
Lightbulb

I'd like to here some input on an idea that has been creeping up on me this year.
I've personally, this year seen four instances where there was defensive encroachment before a PAT kick. Dead ball foul, half the distance and run the play. Twice, the kick went through the uprights on the first try and didn't count, then was missed on the second try. It seems to me that the defence, in these cases benefitted from committing a foul.
I think that I'd like to see defensive encroachment on a PAT become a live-ball foul. Then, the offence could take the point if successful, and go to the kick-off. The flag would still be thrown and if the scoring team wanted to take the penalty and go for two, they could.
What do you guys think??
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon Nov 19, 2001, 08:46pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 2
sounds like you are talking about nfhs rules. it is a dead ball once either team breaks the NZ after the ball is ready for play. i think it is a bad idea to make exceptions like this. i would be all for changing the rule to be more like the college rule but exceptions only confuse things. in your examples, the kicker is simply kicking a dead ball.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue Nov 20, 2001, 08:47pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 156
Yes this is Fed. rules. Actually, I would be for changing to the college rule. Also, you are probably right, we have enough exceptions to rules. The Jr Hi coaches would never be able to remember another exception.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 21, 2001, 10:37am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 169
Actually, this can be a two-edged sword. I have seen two cases this year where a false start allowed the offense to take a second crack at what appeared to be a missed PAT.

The game rules can't be perfect, and justice is not necessarily an objective. The Dead-ball foul is straightforward and simple. That's what the NFHS wants.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon Nov 26, 2001, 01:57pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 1,130
Think of it this way.

If you allowed the play to continue after the defensive player has encroached, you place the holder and the kicker in harm's way. Even the NFL instituted the "unabated path" exception to protect the quarterback in that situation by creating a dead ball foul.

The mission of NFHS is safety. That is why there is encroachment and not offside in NFHS.
__________________
Ed Hickland, MBA, CCP
[email protected]
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:36pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1