REPLY: We really need to get some substantive discussion going on this board. Arguing over semantics isn't really productive IMHO. I see what the NFL Rule Book says, but has anyone ever heard an R on mike ask the winner, "Which team do you want to receive?" No...he asks the winner what he wants to do. So even though the rule book says there are two choices, in practicality, the winner is offered one of three choices. Let's move on...
|
No kidding. We would sit in here and argue about this for two more pages. Who cares??
|
If we are arguing semantics then depending what you call a "choice" there are either TWO or FOUR choices (but not three):
One definition would have TWO choices: 1. Kick or receive. 2. Defend this end or that end. The other definition would have FOUR choices: 1. Kick 2. Receive 3. Defend this end. 4. Defend that end. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The rule says: (a) Receive or kick or (b) Goal his team will defend. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Bob |
REPLY: Actually in the NFL, the R really never gets a chance to ask anything. The winner just tells him what they want, normally, "We'll take the ball." Then he looks at the other guy who points to the goal he wants to defend. And we're done...hopefully here as well!
|
Quote:
Perhaps that's why the rule book offers that he has two "privileges". His choices seem to be unlimited. |
Quote:
Many of the changes in USAn football were also adopted in full by Canadian football, but later. A relatively tiny handful of significant rule differences were original to Canadian football. Robert |
I once heard that the US uses a 100 yard field because at a game once at Harvard there was not enough real estate for the larger field, and this new format stuck.
|
What is USAn??
|
It was me that brought up the metric issue, but as a joke. My point was to let the board know that the option to defer choice to the second half (the question that began this thread) was available in football north of the border and I’m sure it has nothing to do with metric vs. standard measure. It's more concerning the fall Beaver migration in Saskatchewan as I understand it.
With regard to the difference in size of the fields, and I acknowledge that it would never happen, but I’ve often wondered what those great NFL athletes would do with a Canadian Field (110 x 65 & 20 yd. end zones). The players have increased significantly in size over the past 30 years but the field has remained the same size…love to see them enjoy a little more real estate! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
In one OT last year Ron Winter tossed the coin, declared the winner, looked to the captain who gave the "receive" signal, turned and ran off the field. Winter turned to the other captain who had already run off the field and had to shout to him to get the goal option. I need a life I know, but this is a real pet peeve of mine at the NFL level. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:48am. |