November Referee mag test Q#1

[AndrewMcCarthy]

I would say you MIGHT have holding if the K player just tackled R3 but you don't have KCI or anything else on this play. I also don't agree with their rule references.

[Bob M.]

Originally Posted by AndrewMcCarthy

I would say you MIGHT have holding if the K player just tackled R3 but you don't have KCI or anything else on this play. I also don't agree with their rule references.

REPLY: I'm with Andrew here. COULD be holding, but is definitely NOT KCI.

[Two Call]

Kentref:

I was confused too until I re-read case book. 6.5.6E states that guy who made fair catch signal was contacted. In your play, different guy is contacted. I don't think this is interference

[Forksref]

Is this magazine worth it? Currently, I don't subscribe.

I do basketball and football. Is there enough accurate information in there to subscribe? I hear many times that the rulings that they make are questionable.

[Stripe]

Since R touched the ball, do we have anything?

[Bob M.]

Originally Posted by Stripe

Since R touched the ball, do we have anything?

REPLY: If by tackling, we mean that the K player wrapped his arms around R3 and restrained him, then yes...holding by K is a real possibility. But not KCI. Also, a legal block from the front above the waist would have been perfectly legal.