![]() |
Had a clear case of assisting the runner last friday night. A75 grabbed the rb (A32) AT THE b-36, and literally spun him and propelled him another 10 yards. He fell down from the spin at the B-23. So the flag is thrown, and we mark off the 5 yds. My question: why is this not a LOD penality. Not only did the offense gain a net of 8 yards as a result of the play, it was still 1st down.
Is a LOD for this too harsh a penalty? Thanks! |
Why would you make this a loss of down? If the running back gets to where he gets and then gets assited. You enforce it from there so I don't really see why you think this penalty isn't equitable. He would have gotten the first down if assiting the runner didn't occur anyways.
|
The Fed rules are designed to simple. Thus, there are not many loss of down fouls.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
That's your goof. |
Quote:
1/10 for A from B-49. Runner gets to the B-36 (13 yard gain) where the assist runner happens. He spins downto the B-23. We enforced the 5 yards from the B-36. That put the ball on the B-41 for a 1st and 2 from B-41. Thus, the "net gain" of 8 yards. It just did not seem equal to both teams at the time. Now, it does. A lost a 13 yard run (+ 5yds- foul) but it was till first down. That was the questionable part. |
Okay, thanks for clearing that up. You didn't goof! :)
As for the 8 yards, he gained those 8 yards without the benefit of a foul and is entitled to them. Change the play: There's a 5 yard face mask foul on the runner at the 36 yardline for grabbing a facemask on a stiffarm. The result is the same. Mrk off 5 from the spot of the foul, he gained the 8 yards without benefit of the foul. He's entitled to them. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:33pm. |