I would love to discuss them with you, but they don't let us keep the part 2 question sheet and we turn in our answer sheet for our grade.

that is retarded that they don't let you keep you question sheet. How are you supposed to study other than just reading the book?

Really, it's for the best. If you studied off of the Fed tests, you'd just end up very confused.

I'll weigh in on #3. Remember that any ball going into an endzone requires you to know what force caused it to enter the endzone. The question says that R muffed the ball. By rule definition a muff does not cause a new force. Therefore, the force putting the ball in the endzone is the kick and all kicks into the endzone in NFHS rules is a touchback.

Ok, I admit that I just got sucker punched. I fell for the oldest trick in the test book. As a lawyer I was trained many years ago to RTFQ!!!! The way question #3 is written (not the way I read it) it would be a safety scored against K.

How many of you think that the test writer needs to brush up on his rules. In question 90, there is an ineligible A player downfield. Says that this penalty involves a loss of down -- not for the past few years it doesn't.

i just about busted out laughing on the one that says "use your imagination"