|
|||
I know this sounds relatively easily, but I have seen it called both ways....
1st and 10 at A's 40....A2 runs the ball and is momentarily grasped on the face mask at the A42 and goes down at the A43....now the question is this, is it 1st and 2 at the 48 or 2nd and 2 at the 48 after the 5 yard penalty enforcement?
__________________
Respect All Fear None |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Re: face mask thanks
Quote:
Every year I go thru the entire rule book, and highlight important parts. I would strongly suggest doing that. I do have 2 separate emails that have a ton of info and good stuff, especially for new officials. It is stuff I have created, and received from others, or from other officiating sites. If you would like me to send them to you, email me at [email protected] |
|
|||
REPLY: I've seen the same error. It seems that if the situation occurred on a 2nd, 3rd, or 4th down, there would be no problem. It's just that replaying first down so that the result is 1st and 'something-other-than-10' is counter-intuitive. People think it's gotta be wrong.
__________________
Bob M. |
|
|||
I had the same problem withthat before until someone explained it to me like this:
1st and 10 from the A45 and they are running a WR reverse, they flip it to him at the A37 and he is immediately met in the backfield by a LB and an IFM occurs and he is brought down right there. If they were to lose the first down it would now be 2nd and 13 after the mark off, if I were the defense and this were the case I would face mask every single play deep behind the LOS if that were the only way I was going to be able to bring the runner down. __________________________________________________ ___ Do I have something wrong here? Is this an All But One Principle? Should this sitch then be marked from the LOS? [Edited by w_sohl on Jul 26th, 2005 at 07:07 PM]
__________________
"Contact does not mean a foul, a foul means contact." -Me |
|
|||
Canadian Ruling
Quote:
__________________
Pope Francis |
Bookmarks |
|
|