The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jul 21, 2005, 07:50pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Randolph, NJ
Posts: 1,936
Send a message via Yahoo to waltjp
A 3/7 A 33. A1 drops back to pass. While A2 is running his pass route, B3 blocks him to the ground at the A40. A1 still has the ball at this point and throws a forward pass to A2, but the pass is intercepted by B3 who runs it back to the A 28. After the play is blown dead, A4 hits B4 with a shot to the helmet.
__________________
I got a fever! And the only prescription.. is more cowbell!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jul 21, 2005, 08:53pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 133
Ok.. will take a shot at this one.

B3's contact is not pass interefernce as B's restrictions do not begin unitl the ball leaves the passer's hand. It may however, be ruled illegal contact-personal foul on B3 during a loose ball play. Spot of enforcement is the previous spot and penalize B 15 yards from A33 to A48 and A is awarded a first down by attaining the line to gain. A is then penalized a dead ball foul by A4. A will be penalized 15 yards from A's 48 back to A's 33. It is first down and 10 from A's 33.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jul 21, 2005, 09:29pm
Fav theme: Roundball Rock
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Near Dog River (sorta)
Posts: 8,558
Lightbulb Canadian Ruling

Quote:
Originally posted by waltjp
A 3/7 A 33. A1 drops back to pass. While A2 is running his pass route, B3 blocks him to the ground at the A40. A1 still has the ball at this point and throws a forward pass to A2, but the pass is intercepted by B3 who runs it back to the A 28. After the play is blown dead, A4 hits B4 with a shot to the helmet.
This is not a dual foul.

We have illegal contact by the defense and dead ball UR by the offense. Up 10 for the ICER which gives, A 1D/10 @ A-43. Then back 15 for the UR. A 1D/10 @ A-28.
__________________
Pope Francis
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jul 21, 2005, 11:53pm
MJT MJT is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Alton, Iowa
Posts: 1,796
Quote:
Originally posted by waltjp
A 3/7 A 33. A1 drops back to pass. While A2 is running his pass route, B3 blocks him to the ground at the A40. A1 still has the ball at this point and throws a forward pass to A2, but the pass is intercepted by B3 who runs it back to the A 28. After the play is blown dead, A4 hits B4 with a shot to the helmet.
Obviously B did not get the ball with clean hands, so they will not get the ball. It is not an illegal contact foul, as it does not meet the definition. It is an illegal use of hands foul in both NF and NCAA. That is a 10 yard penalty from the PS, and it would be a 1st down for A since the LTG was reached. You would then enforce the DB PF against team A taking the ball back to the 28, where it would be 1st and 10 for A. A4 should be ejected as well.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jul 22, 2005, 06:55am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Randolph, NJ
Posts: 1,936
Send a message via Yahoo to waltjp
Thanks. I had the ball and down and distance correct but forgot all about the disqualified player.
__________________
I got a fever! And the only prescription.. is more cowbell!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jul 22, 2005, 07:40am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 618
Send a message via MSN to grantsrc
You could argue that the block on A2 is legal if he qualifies as a "potential blocker." We had this discussion in another thread a while back. If A2 isn't presenting himself as a blocker, then you would flag B for Illegal use of hands, 9-2-3D. Sit 9.2.3A covers a situation similar to this (2004 Fed books- haven't received 2005 yet )
Then from here I agree with MJT, but depending on the severity of the hit, A4 might not be ejected.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jul 22, 2005, 07:52am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Randolph, NJ
Posts: 1,936
Send a message via Yahoo to waltjp
Agreed

Quote:
Originally posted by grantsrc
You could argue that the block on A2 is legal if he qualifies as a "potential blocker."
I agree, but since the plays says A2 is 'running his route' I'll assume that he's no longer a potention blocker.
__________________
I got a fever! And the only prescription.. is more cowbell!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:33am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1