The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 29, 2004, 08:29am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 522
The other night I got really angry as I watched Fox Sport Net's "The List," and they counted down the Top 10 officiating "screwups" of all time.

First, I started to get mad when they put Phil Luckett on the list. Sure, the Det/Pit Thanksgiving Day game looked bad, but the league very quietly admitted he handled it right. Then they mentioned a play from later in the year in a Jets/Seattle game. It was a play on the GL where the Jets "clearly" didn't score, but the wings ruled it a TD. In no way Luckett's fault on the blown call, and some C-list "celebrity" came up with brilliant quote "Yeah, after you watched the relpay a couple of times you could see he was short." And we all know the officials watched about 5 replays of the play before ruling...oh, wait a minute. The another guy said "I have no idea what he is doing now, but I hoped he tried a new profession." (FYI, he is a back judge in the league, and before he became an R, he worked a Super Bowl as a BJ).

Then at number 2 they had the "tuck rule" play. Now many may say that is a silly rule, but Walt Coleman absolutely made the right call on the replay. They, however, chose to criticize Coleman about "blowing" the call.

If I were the NFL, I would be mad about a company that carries my games on a different network criticizing the league's officials.

On the other hand, they did have the call by Don Denkinger (in the 1985 World Series between the Cardinals and the Royals), and the US basketball team getting "hosed" against the USSR in the Munich Olympics.
__________________
If the play is designed to fool someone, make sure you aren't the fool.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 29, 2004, 09:49am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Mullica Hill, NJ
Posts: 798
What's unfortunate about the Luckett incident is from the article I read that year in Referee it appeared as though the NFL wouldn't back him on it. According to the article the director of officating (Jerry Seeman) at the time said he was correct and both Phil and the PFRA asked the NFL to publicly issue a statement in support of Phil and they didn't. It appears as though the NFL was mostly concerned about image on this one. Phil qualified that year for a playoff game and they didn't give him an assignment, but still paid him a playoff game fee of $9,800.

I guess sometimes you gotta suck it up in this business and simply move on.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:08pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1