![]() |
We don't use any un-approved crew signals in Alabama. I tend to agree that the catch signal (as weel as the wide signal and several others) is unnecessary. It seems like we are trying to explain our call or reassure ourselves that the call is correct when we use these type signals.
|
Quote:
Of course, there's nobody to downgrade my crew over such silliness, either. |
Quote:
If it's too close that he can't tell, it means we're going to measure using the tape before marching off the penalty. I haven't had to do this yet, but I'd rather measure using the existing spot then move the ball forward and THEN bring out the chains. I'm surprised that everyone is so rigid on signals, but maybe those folks don't work with the same crew week after week. I do, so we know what each of us are signalling. And once again, I don't have the signal police nagging us -- in any sport I work. Even in basketball I saw crews working the state final lasty year using NCAA basketball mechanics and signals. No comment whether good or bad, just my observation. --Rich |
Quote:
Peace |
Quote:
Not allowed means that there are repercussions for using the signal. I've not noticed that in IL, but I have no desire to move up the ladder there, just work the occasional assignment. I'm just not that anal about it -- I'm more concerned with calling a good game. BTW, Jeff, Part I hoops is online as of today. --Rich |
Quote:
We have local evaluators who show up unannounced, even in lower games. A couple of weeks ago one showed up at a B-8 game 70 miles from town. Local evaluations definitely have an impact on ratings, thus on assignments. Additionally, state evaluators show up from time to time. Their reviews can effect ratings and chances of getting state play-off games. |
Quote:
I'm just trying to provide some balance -- it seems in every sport there is more emphasis put on which signals to use, which uniforms to wear, and whose a$$ to kiss rather than using sound judgement and good officiating practices. --Rich |
I think using extra signals like this is very helpful at times. By doing that you are indicating why the pass was incomplete. If a player bobbling is the ball on the side line before going OOB and then catches it it can be very helpful to the coaches and the fans to "tell" them why you are calling incomplete pass. The same can be said for catching the ball but not getting a foot inbounds. If you are very clear as to why you are calling it the way you are then you may have less trouble from the coaches.
|
I got that last week.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Peace |
Re: I got that last week.
Quote:
I took the exam closed book in about 15 minutes last night. Scored a 93. Good enough for me -- we only need 90 in WI to retain master status. |
Re: Re: I got that last week.
Quote:
Peace |
Re: Re: Re: I got that last week.
Quote:
--Rich |
back on topic
sorry guys, I can't stand basketball, but I am glad for you and your exams...:D
Arkansas has dictated that, on an incomplete pass, we are not to signal to stop the clock. This is because "everyone" knows that the clock stops on an incomplete pass. This attitude irritates the snot out of me. I like the incomplete/stop clock combo because, when in the R position, I have a good indication of what just happened down field. As for the catch, no catch signal, I have used both only once in the last four years. Both times when I had an excellent view on a close play. Neither time did I hear a peep from the coaches. They both thought that if I was that adamant about a call then I must be sure about my call. |
Re: back on topic
Quote:
--Rich |
Re: Re: back on topic
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:17pm. |