The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sat Sep 04, 2004, 11:56pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1
My son wears a 60% grey mask which you can clearly see his eyes. Is this illegal?

It is not 100% grey which would hide his eyes.

federation rules please.

Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sun Sep 05, 2004, 12:30am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Kirkland, Washington
Posts: 422
Send a message via ICQ to Jim S Send a message via AIM to Jim S
Funny you should ask, I had my first illegal eye shield today.
Federation rules require eyeshield to be clear. The casebook further states that this means 100% transmission of light. A doctor's letter does NOT superceed this rule.
A couple of states have reduced this requiremen, but only a couple.
__________________
Jim Schroeder

Read Rule 2, Read Rule 2, Read Rule 2!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sun Sep 05, 2004, 10:27am
Fav theme: Roundball Rock
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Near Dog River (sorta)
Posts: 8,558
Lightbulb Canadian Ruling

Quote:
Originally posted by peteym
My son wears a 60% grey mask which you can clearly see his eyes. Is this illegal?

It is not 100% grey which would hide his eyes.

federation rules please.

All visors must be clear unless accompanied by medical certification. (1.11.2b)
__________________
Pope Francis
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sun Sep 05, 2004, 11:20am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
Quote:
Originally posted by peteym
My son wears a 60% grey mask which you can clearly see his eyes. Is this illegal?

It is not 100% grey which would hide his eyes.

federation rules please.
No, it's not legal.

1-5-3n
Illegal equipment. No player shall participate while wearing illegal equipment. This applies to any equipment, which in the opinion of the umpire is dangerous, confusing or inappropriate. Illegal equipment shall always include but is not limited to:
Eye shields which are not clear, not molded, or not rigid.

1.5.3 SITUATION D:
During the pregame visit in A's dressing room, the umpire notices that some squad members have eye shields which are: (a) dark, or (b) clear. The coach of A has a letter from a physician indicating that the dark shield is a necessity for the player.

RULING: In (a), the umpire indicates to the coach only eye shields which permit 100% light transmission may be worn, a physician's statement cannot supersede this rule. In (b), the eye shield is legal if, in addition to being clear, it is also molded and rigid, and attached firmly to the helmet.

BTW, 100% and he wouldn't be able to see.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sun Sep 05, 2004, 02:37pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 57
Ditto on the Illegal

We covered this last week at our association and they are making a pretty big deal about it. Only 100% clear is permissible. We are to strictly enforce this.

Coincidentally, while we were waiting to start a Pop Warner game yesterday one of the mothers came over and asked this exact question except that her son was wearing an amber tinted shield. Same answer... illegal.

My instuctor had a case where they had told a player he had to get rid of a tinted eye shield and the player's response was that the SALESMAN had told him it was legal. I'd be wary of the rule interpretations of a guy who was trying to sell me something.

-SW---
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:24pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1