The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Football (https://forum.officiating.com/football/)
-   -   Professional Looking Knickers (https://forum.officiating.com/football/13811-professional-looking-knickers.html)

BigJWalt Mon May 24, 2004 01:25pm

I was looking at getting a new pair of knickers this year. I talked to a guy this weekend who was telling me all knickers are pretty much the same length (inseam). He was explaining how his son puts his pants on first (inside out) up to his knees. Then puts his socks on, then pulls his pants up. He said it look good. My question to you guys...How can I get my knickers to look perfect? Dont get me wrong, they look good, but I want them perfect. I look at the NLF refs, and their pants are besutiful. Do you guys have your pants tailored, or is there a trick to putting them on and bustling them up. Any advice would be helpful. Thanks in advance.

ljudge Mon May 24, 2004 02:18pm

It always looks nice to "cuff" them under at the knee. Never show the elastic. I buy my stuff from Honigs and they have different styles depending on your body type. For example, they have an "athletic cut" and have different "pocket" types to they don't "pooch out"...things like that.

I'd say having them fit correctly is key to having them look good.

shawn.wortman Mon May 24, 2004 02:30pm

I have my knickers tailored to be about three inches below my knee. Prior to a game I tuck two of the extra inches and tape around my upper calf with about an inch overlap over my socks.

A member of my crew has shorter legs so he rolls the knicker and sock together twice and then tapes around his leg.

ABoselli Mon May 24, 2004 03:23pm

The inside out thing works good but I put the socks on first, then the pants and roll them down so they're inside out below the knees. Then I fold the top of the socks over the elastic and pull the pants back up. Socks stay put and the pants stay put.

I'm thinking of the athletic cut Honigs knickers this year, though. I'm sick of buying the Cliff Keens big in the waist so they'll fit my thighs and ***.

Snake~eyes Mon May 24, 2004 05:27pm

Quote:

Originally posted by ABoselli
The inside out thing works good but I put the socks on first, then the pants and roll them down so they're inside out below the knees. Then I fold the top of the socks over the elastic and pull the pants back up. Socks stay put and the pants stay put.
This is exactly how I do it, it looks very sharp imo. Sometimes it takes a coupel times to get it rigth but once I do it looks crisp.

James Neil Tue May 25, 2004 12:18am

Quote:

Originally posted by Snake~eyes
Quote:

Originally posted by ABoselli
The inside out thing works good but I put the socks on first, then the pants and roll them down so they're inside out below the knees. Then I fold the top of the socks over the elastic and pull the pants back up. Socks stay put and the pants stay put.
This is exactly how I do it, it looks very sharp imo. Sometimes it takes a coupel times to get it rigth but once I do it looks crisp.

I also use this method leaving about an inch of black showing below my “athletic cut “ Honigs knickers.

Bob M. Tue May 25, 2004 08:14am

Quote:

Originally posted by James Neil
Quote:

Originally posted by Snake~eyes
Quote:

Originally posted by ABoselli
The inside out thing works good but I put the socks on first, then the pants and roll them down so they're inside out below the knees. Then I fold the top of the socks over the elastic and pull the pants back up. Socks stay put and the pants stay put.
This is exactly how I do it, it looks very sharp imo. Sometimes it takes a coupel times to get it rigth but once I do it looks crisp.

I also use this method leaving about an inch of black showing below my “athletic cut “ Honigs knickers.

REPLY: Who am I to argue with Jim, snake-eyes, and ABoselli. I use the same method. And they're right...it really presents a sharp look.

Mike Simonds Tue May 25, 2004 02:46pm

Wow!
 
This is sure interesting! I did not realize that there are so many ways to pull your pants up!

I put my socks on first, then the knickers. I pull the bottom of the knickers up so that the elastic bottoms of the pant legs are just under my knee caps. Then I pull the overlaps down about 2 or 3 inches over my socks. My calfs seem to be wide enough to hug the overlap and the pants stay put for the entire game, even with all the bending over, etc. at my umpire position.

Just one thing I noticed is that the Honig's knickers, especially the athletic cut and the elite version, seem to have the best made elastic bottoms on the knicker legs. They hug your legs comfortably and stay put.

ABoselli Tue May 25, 2004 03:27pm

That's it. I'm getting the Honigs ath-a-letic cut.

SWFLguy Thu May 27, 2004 01:15pm

I concur with Mike Simonds---
and not just because being an umpire !
also---
I tuck my shirt into a pair of
white shorts so that the stripes
do not show through the pant tops !!
that really looks horrible !!

ABoselli Fri May 28, 2004 07:42am

Amen with the stripes showing through the pants. I use black compression shorts.

It never ceases to amaze me the vets I see sporting the stripes showing through the pants look. Terrible.

JMN Fri May 28, 2004 11:15am

Quote:

Originally posted by ABoselli
Amen with the stripes showing through the pants. I use black compression shorts.

It never ceases to amaze me the vets I see sporting the stripes showing through the pants look. Terrible.

So the big controversy,

SWFLguy says to use WHITE compression shorts to hide the stripes.

AB says to use BLACK compression shorts to hide the stripes.

What do most of you use? I've heard the white ones make your knickers look "whiter" and if you get a tear, then it's white under white.

Others maintain that the black does a better job covering the stripes and how many times have you torn a pair of knickers in the last 100 years?

What's the consensus?

Since we're on undergarments here, :eek: those of you that have gone the UnderArmour route, what advantages do you get that are better than the McDavid-type Intermax stuff?

Ref Ump Welsch Fri May 28, 2004 11:34am

I use white McDavids. Looks nicer.

Ed Hickland Fri May 28, 2004 12:03pm

Quote:

Originally posted by JMN
Quote:

Originally posted by ABoselli
Amen with the stripes showing through the pants. I use black compression shorts.

It never ceases to amaze me the vets I see sporting the stripes showing through the pants look. Terrible.

So the big controversy,

SWFLguy says to use WHITE compression shorts to hide the stripes.

AB says to use BLACK compression shorts to hide the stripes.

What do most of you use? I've heard the white ones make your knickers look "whiter" and if you get a tear, then it's white under white.

Others maintain that the black does a better job covering the stripes and how many times have you torn a pair of knickers in the last 100 years?

What's the consensus?

Since we're on undergarments here, :eek: those of you that have gone the UnderArmour route, what advantages do you get that are better than the McDavid-type Intermax stuff?

Been using the white shorts for 20 years and it does make the white look whiter, I think. But maybe it is time to look at black shorts.

I tried the Nike Stay-Dri the other night for cycling where I had been using the MCDavid shirt. Really like the Nike stuff because it is lighter and seems to absorb the sweat better.

Also, if you use the McDavid shirt make sure whoever does the wash does not use fabric softener, it ruins the absorbent property.

kentref Fri May 28, 2004 08:22pm

I typically wear white McDavid shorts in warmer weather. When it gets colder, I switch to black full length compression tights. Can't say that I have a preference as far as looks go. Either way, you've got to keep the stripes covered up. Looks tacky otherwise.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:16am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1