The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 10, 2003, 03:46pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 21
Question

I use some of the questions discussed on this site at our association meetings, and the other members are well aware of this. Hence, the other night after a long debated discussion on an issue, I was asked to pose this on the site for other input. During a Saturday varsity game the week before, A is losing 21-6, having been scored on twice in the last 4 minutes on two 60+ yard fly patterns. A now has the ball 2nd down on B's 16 with 6 seconds left in the first half. QB takes the snap, drops back, and prior to the pass, right guard for A is flagged for holding. B1 then intercepts the pass on the 2 and returns it to the 12. During the run back, B2 is flagged for block in the back, and the clock runs out of time for the half.

The referee offers B its options, and naturally B declines the holding in order to keep the ball. (A short discussion amongst the association members that the linesmen should inform the coaches that though both are live ball fouls, it is not a double foul since there was a change of possession and B declined.) The referee then offers A the option to either accept the block in the back penalty and play one untimed down, or decline the penalty to end the half. A does not want to run another play due to being burnt deep on the past two possession by B for scores and declines the penalty. Referee signals holding on A declined, Block to back on B declined, and then signals end of quarter/half.

Some of the officials agree that this was the right protocol. Others stated that A has no choice and the penalty against B must enforced according to Rule 10.2.2. One of our older officials supported this opinion with case book p. 76, 10.2.2 Sit. A which is almost the same except A has illegal motion and B is charged with clipping after the intercept. The case book states ". . . the penalty by B2 must be enforced." The discussion at the association meeting was whether "must be enforced" means that the choice must be given to "A" as was done and that it cannot merely be forgotten/overlooked because of the change of possession and the half ending, or does enforce mean that A and the officials have no choice but to mark off the penalty and play the untimed down, even if A does not want to accept it.

As always, I thank you in advance for any and all input and support.



__________________
Hey coach, this is Friday night, not Sunday afternoon.

Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:58pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1