More Ohio Micromanaging!
|
Great clarifications and improvement to the Ohio Gold book. The Gold Book has made significant advances to officiating in Ohio.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Quote:
receiver must have the opportunity to perform a second act (i.e. dive to pylon, possess & turn up field in order to rule catch. Sounds like a "bridge too far" and is a lot closer to NFL than NFHS. |
Quote:
Peace |
Quote:
Over many decades, the rules makers have fiddled with the presence or absence of add'l wording to clarify what "possession" is, and I don't know if they ever succeed in clarifying it or taking any element of judgment out of it. |
Quote:
NFL players ROUTINELY perform physical acts teenagers usually only fantasize about. The two games are on completely different levels, for completely different purposes (each of which work very well on their own LEVEL). Consistency is a laudable and achievable objective, within a game, maybe within a season at the same level. EXPECTING it on EVERYTHING between different levels is simply an impossible overreach. As levels rise, so do individual skills and rules, at times, need to adjust to keep pace with higher skills. |
Too bad you can't fine coaches who let players violate uniform rules like the players get fined in the NFL!! :)
|
Quote:
Actually, I think it is easier to rule on catches because the players are a little slower, but I still use the same basic standards before I rule a catch. I don't need state guidelines to make those rulings either. Peace |
You see micromanaging, I see philosophies to ensure more consistent officiating.
|
Quote:
I have been critical of the Gold Book in the past and the whole "contenders/pretenders" nonsense, but this is a great document I will probably use myself in an association meeting. |
Quote:
(NFHS : 2-4). "Perform a second act" seems extraordinarily ambiguous, subject to never ending interpretation and dispute, where as assessing and judging "possession", maintained while in contact with the ground in-bounds is finite, after which whatever happens, happens. (continues to advance, stopped, fumble, TD, OOB, etc) |
Personal Foul
1. Contact with the helmet in an attempt to punish is a foul & may result in a DQ.** If you judge contact to be an attempt to punish why would you say may? Shouldn't any contact that is deemed an attempt to punish be a DQ?? |
I may not connect the way I wanted.
No targeting is an automatic DQ in NFHS football. |
Quote:
Peace |
Quote:
Even the various codes' use of the concept of "control" of the ball as something possibly distinct (Because why else use a different word?) from "grasp" or "possession" is fishy. Yes, "possession" has a technical meaning to which "grasp" and "control" are only inputs, but the language could easily be simplified. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:41pm. |