The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Nov 20, 2015, 08:36pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,916
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge View Post
About all a kid buys for football is the shoes and some basic stuff to wear outside your uniform. A baseball kid has to buy a glove, a bat or have them provided and other things just to be able to play. Football most of the equipment is provided and not owned by the players.
What's the difference who's paying for it, it's still more expensive equipment.
Quote:
Also you are playing a lot fewer games and not playing weeks on end just to play close to 100 games. There is a reason that inner city kids are not playing baseball very much as they have to take on a financial commitment just to play.
You're referring to a very select segment of kids as playing 100 games (a year, I suppose). How does it look for the avg. child player? If you count total field time, practice + games, I bet it's more for football than for baseball for the avg. child playing adult-organized ball.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 22, 2015, 12:28am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 220
Regarding equipment expense:
Financial burdens can be placed on different people, depending on performance level, regional culture and the type of league. The fact that private individuals frequently bear the cost for soccer, baseball, tennis, golf, etc., while it's public institutions or wealthy private schools that bear the cost for football, should shed light on the relative expense of football.

Regarding propensity to injury:
By the end of week 2 of the NFL season, enough players had had to be taken out of games with injuries to field the starting lineups for the entire CFL, and still have a few left over. Most of the injuries are related to collisions that occurs during play. Players in the NFL average 3.3 seasons. By comparison, most MLB injuries are related to chronic or excessive strain, and the average career length is 5.6 seasons.

Other sports typically considered "non-contact" such as baseball have their moments when it comes to injuries, but the difference is that it is shocking when they happen. When the two Cardinals outfielders collided near the end of last season, it was newsworthy partly because baseball players rarely have major concussions like that. The NFL and NCAA have only recently instituted programs to prevent football players from returning to the game after receiving concussions, while MLB is just recently detecting concussions in their players. That MLB plays 10 times as many games as NFL teams do, and their concussion rate is much lower, should tell a lot about the likelihood of injury in their games.

Finally, regarding ownership:
It shouldn't be embarrasing that football is more expensive and the players are more prone to injury. It's just an attribute of the game. If you ignore it, you prevent yourself from adjusting to the reality and responding as necessary. Enjoy the games you love, but respect the costs. Once you understand and appreciate the costs, you can be in a position to take the necessary actions to keep the game alive. Otherwise, you'll find yourself with no game, bitter about that fact, and living in a country with hundreds of enormous memorials scattered around the country, honoring a time when we paid people large sums of money (or marginally valuable educations) in exchange for entertainment.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 22, 2015, 03:23pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,564
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Goodman View Post
What's the difference who's paying for it, it's still more expensive equipment.

You're referring to a very select segment of kids as playing 100 games (a year, I suppose). How does it look for the avg. child player? If you count total field time, practice + games, I bet it's more for football than for baseball for the avg. child playing adult-organized ball.
My point was not what is actually more expensive overall, my point was that schools have been funding the helmets and pads for years. I never payed to have most of the items that were necessary to play football. And that equipment is reused year after year. A baseball player does not give back a glove or in some cases bats. As a matter of fact I have my gloves from years ago at my parent's home. A baseball player plays many more games and potentially does much more traveling over a a similar period of time.

And most of all, whether you or others want to accept this fact, baseball when the World Series going on did not come up to the TV ratings or even a meaningless Monday Night Football game. Football is still very popular both college and pro and all these situations will do is prevent the fringe kid from playing for the most part. I do not see football going away at all. I do see it might not be played under high schools anymore, but that might happen for a lot of sports as club and other non-scholastic sports are becoming more and more popular. But the best athletes who are often inner-city kids are not going to stop playing football and replace it with soccer, baseball or lacrosse. If anything there might be more kids that play basketball and many football players play basketball already.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 22, 2015, 04:30pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,916
Yes, I strongly doubt it's going away, though it may wane somewhat in popularity. Football's been thru bad times before. Hard to believe it'd suffer horribly for long compared to skateboarding, bicycling, or psychedelics.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 22, 2015, 10:36pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,564
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Goodman View Post
Yes, I strongly doubt it's going away, though it may wane somewhat in popularity. Football's been thru bad times before. Hard to believe it'd suffer horribly for long compared to skateboarding, bicycling, or psychedelics.
Remember the X-Games were supposed to take over the world and hardly anyone pays attention to those sports. Football is going no where.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 01, 2015, 10:03am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: West Bend, WI
Posts: 336
If these youth and high school coaches were held a little more accountable when they give their team equipment out too, a good portion of this would go away, IMO...along with teaching proper techniques.

Athletic trainers are working at high schools in our area and are now fitting most kids. The youth programs you still have kids picking out their favorite facemask pattern, regardless of how the helmet matches up on the kid and coaches are letting it slide or are too busy to follow thru with correct fittings. That stuff was going on even when I was a kid playing in the early 80s.
__________________
"Assumption is the mother of all screw-ups...."
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:55am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1