The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed Sep 10, 2003, 02:49pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 85
Question


Team A ties the score 53-53 after a made free throw by team A with only 10 seconds to go in the 4th qtr. With all the excitement involved, a team A player (A1) erroneoulsy grabs the ball to attempt a throw in under his own goal, the officials don't realize what is happening, A1 attempts an inbounds to A2 when B1 commits a foul against A2 while attempting a steal. What do you do?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed Sep 10, 2003, 03:10pm
certified Hot Mom tester
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: only in my own mind, such as it is
Posts: 12,918
Post

You blow your whistle and say that you are calling team A for a delay of game warning for interfering with team B's ability to inbound the ball promptly. You act very strong about that being your call and that you are making your call before the foul occurred.

This is really not the same as team A delaying by violating the boundary on a throw-in in the final few seconds to stop the clock. In that case, we are supposed to ignore the violation.

If anyone gives you any grief, stare at their pants(an oldie but a goodie), then puke on their shoes (another blast from the past).
__________________
Yom HaShoah
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Sep 11, 2003, 01:54pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 127
Thumbs up

Good Call!!!

And don't forget to put the time back on the clock......
__________________
Refiator
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu Sep 11, 2003, 03:03pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: In a little pink house
Posts: 5,289
Question

Quote:
Originally posted by Mlancaster
Good Call!!!

And don't forget to put the time back on the clock......
While I agree with the desire to undo the damage done by A (i.e., running time off the clock), is there a legal justification for this? There wasn't a timing error.
__________________
"It is not enough to do your best; you must know what to do, and then do your best." - W. Edwards Deming
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu Sep 11, 2003, 05:46pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,126
Quote:
Originally posted by Back In The Saddle
Quote:
Originally posted by Mlancaster
Good Call!!!

And don't forget to put the time back on the clock......
While I agree with the desire to undo the damage done by A (i.e., running time off the clock), is there a legal justification for this? There wasn't a timing error.
Yes. It's in the casebook under "A specific unsportsmanlike act" or similar.

Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu Sep 11, 2003, 07:44pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Houghton, U.P., Michigan
Posts: 9,953
Quote:
Originally posted by bob jenkins
Quote:
Originally posted by Back In The Saddle
Quote:
Originally posted by Mlancaster
Good Call!!!

And don't forget to put the time back on the clock......
While I agree with the desire to undo the damage done by A (i.e., running time off the clock), is there a legal justification for this? There wasn't a timing error.
Yes. It's in the casebook under "A specific unsportsmanlike act" or similar.

Yes, bob. That is Case 9.2.11 Comment with 5 seconds remaining, or less.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 12, 2003, 02:06am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,004
Quote:
Originally posted by bob jenkins
Quote:
Originally posted by Back In The Saddle
Quote:
Originally posted by Mlancaster
Good Call!!!

And don't forget to put the time back on the clock......
While I agree with the desire to undo the damage done by A (i.e., running time off the clock), is there a legal justification for this? There wasn't a timing error.
Yes. It's in the casebook under "A specific unsportsmanlike act" or similar.

Mick, Bob's got ya on this one!
See 10.1.8
It spells out exactly what to do.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 12, 2003, 06:45am
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Houghton, U.P., Michigan
Posts: 9,953
Quote:
Originally posted by Nevadaref

Mick, Bob's got ya on this one!
See 10.1.8
It spells out exactly what to do.
YU.P., yU.P.
I went down the wrong road again yet.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 12, 2003, 08:08am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 107
Read Case Book play 10.1.8--there is a procedure for confusion and one for intentional.
__________________
Trust me coach !!!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 12, 2003, 08:18am
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally posted by APHP
Read Case Book play 10.1.8--there is a procedure for confusion and one for intentional.
That's the play that Nevada Ref cited above-about 6 hours ago.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:13pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1