![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Let's Go To The Videotape ...
Quote:
the boundary plane and knocks the ball out of A1’s hands. Team B has not been warned previously for a throw-in plane infraction. RULING: B1 is charged with a technical foul and it also results in the official having a team warning recorded and reported to the head coach. COMMENT: In situations with the clock running and five or less seconds left in the game, a throw-in plane violation or interfering with the ball following a goal should be ignored if its only purpose is to stop the clock. However, if the tactic in any way interferes with the thrower’s efforts to make a throw-in, a technical foul for delay shall be called even though no previous warning had been issued. In this situation, if the official stopped the clock and issued a team warning, it would allow the team to benefit from the tactic. (4- 47-1; 10-1-5b, c; 10-3-10) |
Not quite
Quote:
Subsequent ejections while on probation will require that trip to Austin to have your punishment determined by the exec committee. Since ADs hate to be associated with this process coaches are much more fearful of their wrath than that of the EC. I know several coaches who have been let go after repeated ejections because they were "embarassing" their programs. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:56pm. |