The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   Kentucky women's coach ejected (Video) (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/99030-kentucky-womens-coach-ejected-video.html)

bballref3966 Mon Jan 12, 2015 06:41pm

Do any of you believe that male coaches are more likely to lay into male officials than female officials, and thus more prone to getting technical fouls from male officials?

Raymond Mon Jan 12, 2015 09:17pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by bballref3966 (Post 949936)
Do any of you believe that male coaches are more likely to lay into male officials than female officials, and thus more prone to getting technical fouls from male officials?

I have found female coaches are more likely to confront me because they are already used to dealing with men bigger than them. That was back in the days when I used to still do girls games in high school.

Nevadaref Mon Jan 12, 2015 09:43pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef (Post 949950)
I have found female coaches are more likely to confront me because they are already used to dealing with men better than them. That was back in the days when I used to still do girls games in high school.

"...with men better than them" or did you mean better than women?

Raymond Mon Jan 12, 2015 09:46pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nevadaref (Post 949951)
"...with men better than them" or did you mean better than women?

:o. Fixed it: bigger than them

bob jenkins Mon Jan 12, 2015 10:47pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef (Post 949952)
:o. Fixed it: bigger than them


Did you mean bigger than THEM or bigger than THEY? (I think the latter)

Rich Tue Jan 13, 2015 08:57am

Quote:

Originally Posted by bballref3966 (Post 949936)
Do any of you believe that male coaches are more likely to lay into male officials than female officials, and thus more prone to getting technical fouls from male officials?

Absolutely.

MD Longhorn Tue Jan 13, 2015 09:01am

I think 99% of us would not issue the second T unless there was something verbal. Given that these guys are where they are --- I think that leads to the obviously conclusion that there WAS something verbal. The assumption by many above that there was not, and the implication that therefore the officials were too quick on the second T --- well that's kind of obtuse, don't you think?

AremRed Tue Jan 13, 2015 11:36am

Quote:

Originally Posted by MD Longhorn (Post 950025)
I think 99% of us would not issue the second T unless there was something verbal.

The coach got the 2nd T for not stopping his tantrum, he continues shaking his fists at the Lead at 10 seconds. Don't think it was solely verbal, there was plenty of body language to toss him.

Raymond Tue Jan 13, 2015 11:41am

Quote:

Originally Posted by AremRed (Post 950064)
The coach got the 2nd T for not stopping his tantrum, he continues shaking his fists at the Lead at 10 seconds. Don't think it was solely verbal, there was plenty of body language to toss him.

The first T was for the tantrum. The second T is for whatever is said directly to the Lead. In my experiences that sentence usually is something along the lines of "call the f*cking foul".

HawkeyeCubP Tue Jan 13, 2015 12:31pm

1. Enterline's a top-10 women's official, so I'm confident it was warranted, and
2. it's possible (and likely) there were warnings/discussions about coach's behavior/conduct prior to this

JRutledge Tue Jan 13, 2015 01:08pm

I see enough to warrant a second T. Shut up and then you will not get T'd again. Otherwise you rolled the dice and already got your say.

Peace

jeremy341a Tue Jan 13, 2015 02:50pm

3 for 3. Looks like he takes a jab at the third official on the way out.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:16pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1