Another first

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by Adam

They do issue interpretations, and sometimes they can be a bit wild.

Maybe IAABO meant to say that this is an automatic intentional foul, kind of like a foul against the thrower in an inbounding situation:

9-2-10-Penalty: If an opponent(s) contacts the thrower, an intentional personal foul shall be charged to the offender.

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by BillyMac

Maybe IAABO meant to say that this is an automatic intentional foul, kind of like a foul against the thrower in an inbounding situation:

9-2-10-Penalty: If an opponent(s) contacts the thrower, an intentional personal foul shall be charged to the offender.

And we only have that ruling because Mary or one of her friends kicked that situation in a game back when the boundary plane mattered.

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

And we only have that ruling because Mary or one of her friends kicked that situation in a game back when the boundary plane mattered.

Sounds interesting. Can you elaborate? Maybe just a short synopsis.