![]() |
|
|||
Video Request Backcourt NBA
12/25/14 GS vs LAC 5:09 4th quarter
Blake Griffin advancing by dribbling, crossed the midcourt line with both feet, but not the ball, then returned to the backcourt, while still dribbling, and it was called a violation. Is the rule the same in the NBA as NFHS and NCAA - all three points having to contact the frontcourt? Thanks, to whoever can pull the video.
__________________
To be good at a sport, one must be smart enough to play the game -- and dumb enough to think that it's important . . . ![]() |
|
|||
Rule is the same:
Rule 4, Section V d. A ball being dribbled is (1) in the frontcourt when the ball and both feet of the player are in the frontcourt, (2) in the backcourt if the ball or either foot of the player is in the backcourt.
__________________
Chaos isn't a pit. Chaos is a ladder. Many who try to climb it fail and never get to try again. The fall breaks them. And some, given a chance to climb, they refuse. They cling to the realm, or the gods, or love. Illusions. Only the ladder is real. The climb is all there is. |
|
|||
Thanks, APG. They missed this one, and the commentators were just as incorrect in their assessment.
__________________
To be good at a sport, one must be smart enough to play the game -- and dumb enough to think that it's important . . . ![]() |
|
|||
Haven't seen the video, but it looks like the NBA rule regarding when the ball gains frontcourt status during a dribble is the same as NFHS and NCAA. Rule is 4-V-d. If the shot clock hit 16 before he got the ball across, it might have been an eight-second violation rather than a BC violation.
|
|
|||
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Chaos isn't a pit. Chaos is a ladder. Many who try to climb it fail and never get to try again. The fall breaks them. And some, given a chance to climb, they refuse. They cling to the realm, or the gods, or love. Illusions. Only the ladder is real. The climb is all there is. |
|
|||
Case play 98 explicitly verifies what you're saying, but it doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me logically. If I'm not mistaken, the clock doesn't count down a second until a second has completed, right? Otherwise the clock would immediately go to 23 when it's started. So that would mean that one second has elapsed when the clock goes to 23, two have elapsed when it goes to 22, etc. That would mean that the moment the clock reads 16, eight seconds have elapsed. On the same token, NCAAM officials are looking for continued BC status when the shot clock says 25 (as opposed to 24), right?
|
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Chaos isn't a pit. Chaos is a ladder. Many who try to climb it fail and never get to try again. The fall breaks them. And some, given a chance to climb, they refuse. They cling to the realm, or the gods, or love. Illusions. Only the ladder is real. The climb is all there is. |
|
|||
Watching live I thought this was a 100% violation at first. It really throws you off cuz Blake is able to keep the dribble from hitting the floor for so long you have to be extremely patient to see where the ball becomes established. Plus, I think Lead made the call even though the play was behind him. It could have been C, but I do remember the calling official being almost 10 feet in front of the play.
|
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
That makes sense. Thanks for sharing!
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Video request: Mercer basket with 1:07 left in 2nd half (Video) | Nevadaref | Basketball | 13 | Sat Mar 22, 2014 03:04pm |
Video Request Indiana Miami: Foul causes a travel (Video Added) | Sharpshooternes | Basketball | 12 | Fri May 24, 2013 04:44pm |
[Video Request] Backcourt off of halfcourt pass/shot? | Afrosheen | Basketball | 39 | Wed May 15, 2013 02:39pm |
Video request: OVC Title game Murray St. vs. Belmont (Video Added) | JRutledge | Basketball | 8 | Sat Mar 23, 2013 06:18pm |
Video Request: Minn vs. UCLA (Video Added) | JRutledge | Basketball | 9 | Sat Mar 23, 2013 01:47pm |