Kentucky-Belmont Women 2:40 left in game Continuous Motion (Video)

[ZonaZebra]

Continuous motion ???? Travel????

Thanks

I believe this was on the SEC Network

[jeschmit]

[Camron Rust]

Looks good to me. She had picked up the ball about the same time as the contact.

[Raymond]

On the Men's side, that would not be a shooting foul because upward motion had not started yet.

Contact occurs before gather, no shot.

[HawkeyeCubP]

Try hadn't begun, in my opinion. "Before the shot."

[ZonaZebra]

First, a big thanks to jeschmit for finding and posting the clip.

The reason I was interested in this clip is due to the fact that recently in my observations provided to me by certified officials they have commented on how they think I am too liberal with my continuation rulings.

I just happened to be flipping through games and by luck caught this play. I believe I would have made the same ruling, but was interested to see what others thought.

I believe there was also a follow up replay of this which showed the angle from the endline and it brought up another issue which you can't see too well from the currently posted clip. The issue concerns a potential travel. I would be interested in hearing other thoughts on this. If a player travels on a continuation play then the goal could not count, is that correct? Of course, the player would then be entitled to two free throws, right?