While I do agree with your response, I'm not sure I've ever actually seen a foul on a shot/drive which was followed by a travel and attempt, that got waved off, yet 2 free throws were awarded. I understand and agree with the intent of the rule, I'm just not sure I've ever seen, and I know I've never called it. Have you or anyone called this, or called it often??

Foxtrot, Lima, Oscar, Papa.

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/TmolqFC_oEM" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

I still see a foul. I still don't see how you count the basket.

Blocking foul for really poor acting, no travel, and count the basket, plus award one FT as this gives the defender the maximum punishment.

Can you tell that I don't like attempts to deceive the officials?

From this angle, it is much easier to tell. If you call that foul, you can not also award the shot.

agreed

Yep...called it 2-3 times over 20+ years.

From that angle I see a block. But W3 was still dribbling the ball when the foul occured.

MTD, Sr.

From the tape:

If its in may game its probably a no call and count the hoop.

If I am calling a foul its a block on the defender and ball out of bounds.

At full speed I see a block for the defender's left knee contact and reroute of the B/H. Also at full speed I thought she had not ended her dribble. She does catch it right after the contact so i can see why the continuation. IMHO, she had not completed the dribble and should have been ball out of bounds on the endline to white. I talked with one of the partners on the game and he told me they were all fine with the call. In fact they thought it was "an easy one" and were fine with the continuous motion ruling.

Same thing I thought when seeing that angle from the endline.

I do not even see a foul. I see a flop that hardly resulted in any contact. The dribbler kept going and did not seem to be altered in any way because of the contact.

Peace