The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   Dallas Mavericks vs Chicago Bulls (Video) (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/98758-dallas-mavericks-vs-chicago-bulls-video.html)

maroonx Wed Dec 03, 2014 08:49am

Dallas Mavericks vs Chicago Bulls (Video)
 
No call on the play but for NFHS purposes ,I believe Chicago player had legal guarding position. Both feet on the floor facing opponent.

4th quarter 5:28. #25 Dallas player fakes going up for the 3 point shot. Chicago defender goes for fake and is in the air but lands close to #25. #25 then leans forward to draw a foul on the shot after the Chicago player clearly landed with both feet on the floor before shot attempt. Leaning into the Chicago player causes him to go back.

I have a PC on #25 if it was a high school game.

Raymond Wed Dec 03, 2014 08:58am

Quote:

Originally Posted by maroonx (Post 945384)
No call on the play but for NFHS purposes ,I believe Chicago player had legal guarding position. Both feet on the floor facing opponent.

4th quarter 5:28. #25 Dallas player fakes going up for the 3 point shot. Chicago defender goes for fake and is in the air but lands close to #25. #25 then leans forward to draw a foul on the shot after the Chicago player clearly landed with both feet on the floor before shot attempt. Leaning into the Chicago player causes him to go back.

I have a PC on #25 if it was a high school game.

I have to see how much of an advantage the bolded action caused.

APG Wed Dec 03, 2014 10:46am

<iframe width="853" height="480" src="//www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/xlb7cxCnijg" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

bob jenkins Wed Dec 03, 2014 11:17am

Good no call, imo. The contact by the offense did not allow him to get off a clean shot, and the defender wasn't put at a disadvantage (knocked down, for example).

Raymond Wed Dec 03, 2014 11:18am

Most definitely not an offensive foul.

fullor30 Wed Dec 03, 2014 11:20am

Quote:

Originally Posted by bob jenkins (Post 945425)
Good no call, imo. The contact by the offense did not allow him to get off a clean shot, and the defender wasn't put at a disadvantage (knocked down, for example).

Agreed

HokiePaul Wed Dec 03, 2014 11:22am

Quote:

Originally Posted by maroonx (Post 945384)
No call on the play but for NFHS purposes ,I believe Chicago player had legal guarding position. Both feet on the floor facing opponent.

4th quarter 5:28. #25 Dallas player fakes going up for the 3 point shot. Chicago defender goes for fake and is in the air but lands close to #25. #25 then leans forward to draw a foul on the shot after the Chicago player clearly landed with both feet on the floor before shot attempt. Leaning into the Chicago player causes him to go back.

I have a PC on #25 if it was a high school game.

I don't think the defender regained legal guarding position because I don't think he was facing the defender when both feet were on the floor. That said, I like the no call more than either a PC or a block/push.

Raymond Wed Dec 03, 2014 11:31am

The official in question used to post here, so he must have gotten the call right. :D

Camron Rust Wed Dec 03, 2014 12:31pm

Defender was still moving forward at the time of contact, so I couldn't have a PC but I don't think I'd call a block either since the actions of the offense are what put the offensive player at a disadvantage, not the contact from the defender.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:20pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1