![]() |
Dirbbling FIBA rule interpretation
In the official rule book I came across this
During a dribble the ball may be thrown into the air provided the ball touches the floor or another player before the player who threw it touches it again with his hand. There is no limit to the number of steps a player may take when the ball is not in contact with his hand Does this mean, A1 can throw the ball forward, take several steps, before the ball bounces and after the ball bounces touch/catch it? Isn't this a violation? |
if after they toss the ball and hits the floor and or a player, they can either continue dribbling or catch the ball without violating. Now if they catch the ball then dribble, this would be a double dribble.
|
Legal play....there are no rules on the direction the ball has to go on a dribble even though the traditional dribble has the the ball always going down.
The NFHS rule's wording is slightly different and I think it is also what the FIBA rule you cite is intending to say. Since your rule says, "during a dribble", that means there is some element that can occur even after the dribble has started. In the case of the NFHS, with its slightly different wording, it is also legal for a player to bat (but not throw) the ball UP (into the air) with their hand underneath as long as they let it hit the floor or another player before touching it again. |
There is no limit on steps per dribble so regardless of height or direction of the release of the ball to begin dribble the player is considered to be dribbling. Number of steps between touches is not an issue until they gather the ball again.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Consider this: 1. Team A initiates a fast break and A1 receives the ball just before the half court line. There is one transition defender B1 ahead of A1 2. Why doesn't A1 just throw the ball forward towards the basket, beat B1 with pace, catch it after one bounce and finish the lay up? I mean this is considerably easier to do than dribble all the way and use skill to beat the defender, isn't it? |
Quote:
If A1 continues the dribble, without catching the ball, such action is legal. If, after catching the ball, A1 starts a new dribble, the dribble limitations - double dribble rules - are in consideration by the covering official. |
Quote:
So as per the rule, what people do in the dunk contest- throw it up, run, catch it after a bounce and dunk it; is a LEGAL play. Right? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
foot movement/pivot foot/travelling come into consideration. Dunk contests have no such rules -- travelling is not a consideration in a dunk contest, and it is quite often observed that the dunker travels in his approach, but nobody cares, in that enviroment . . . |
Anybody Got A Problem With This ...
Quote:
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/RF3VcagfoZg" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I don't think this play is in the case books. A try for field goal is defined as an attempt by a player to score 2 or 3 points by throwing ball in his own basket....player is trying for goal if he has the ball and "in officials judgment" he is throwing or attempting to throw for goal. In the video the player ends his dribble, throws the ball off the backboard and catches it without it touching another player. If you, the referee, believe this was a try then when he catches it off the backboard it is a legal rebound. However, if you determine that it is not an attempt to score but simply a pass to himself then the player violates when he touches the ball before anyone else off the board. I don't believe there is any rule or play providing that any ball thrown by the offense against its backboard is always a try. If there is a case book play please let me know. I would say that I wouldnt call the violation unless it was really, really obvious to all that it was a pass and not a try. I think the video shows a violation. I wouldn't have processed this quick enough had it happened to me in a game. Having seen the play and the question I hope I will remember it in the future. Again, if I'm wrong and there's a case book play please let me know. Thx |
Quote:
NFHS: Casebook play 9.5 NCAA Men's: A.R. 105 NBA: 9. Player A1 passes the ball and it hits his backboard. May Player A1 be the first to touch the ball? Yes. A player may be the first to touch his own pass if the ball touches his basket ring, backboard or another player. RULE 10 - SECTION XIII - g |
Quote:
|
Own Backboard ...
Quote:
ball against: (a) his/her own backboard; (b) the opponent’s backboard; or (c) an official and catches the ball after each. RULING: Legal in (a); a team’s own backboard is considered part of that team’s “equipment” and may be used. In (b) and (c), A1 has violated; throwing the ball against an opponent’s backboard or an official constitutes another dribble, provided A1 is first to touch the ball after it strikes the official or the board. (4-4-5; 4-15-1, 2; Fundamental 19) Question: In (a), can said player legally start a dribble? |
Quote:
It would be nice if rule 4 said any ball thrown by a player against his own backboard is a try or maybe better, say a player may throw the ball off his backboard after ending a dribble, be first to catch or touch it and may then dribble shoot or pass. that would make this clear but as someone else said in a different thread, the rules just don't cover every scenario. if they did the book would be a lot thicker. i obviously missed/forgot about the case book play earlier so maybe i am missing rule support for play A. let me know if i did. thx |
Only Three Choices ...
Quote:
ART. 1 A try for field goal. ART. 2 A touch by an opponent. ART. 3 A pass or fumble which has then touched, or been touched by, another player Have any of these three things happened? |
Quote:
But the case book says he can catch it. i'm asking if there is rule support for the catch off of the board. Something more than the casebook play. There could be I'm just not seeing it. If the NFHS is going to let him catch the ball when the rules, in my opinion say he shouldn't be able to, then I guess it is my frustration saying let him dribble it also. Anyway, I'm looking for something other than the case book play, something in rules, which allows him to catch the ball off the board after dribbling etc. thx for your reply. |
Other than a slam dunk contest, your going to rule a pass against the his/her backboard as a try.
|
Equipment ???
Quote:
|
Quote:
Sometimes, they try fixing inadvertent changes with case plays and interpretations. When they change a rule for one purpose, and realize later that it affected other things they didn't want affected (see above), rather than try to find another way to change the rule without affecting the other plays, they simply leave the rule changed and issue a case play that "fixes" the problem. Only it doesn't. |
Quote:
The play we are talking about though says it is a pass. The play is not deeming it a try. It's says it is ok because it is part of teams equipment...I don't see where that comes from in the actual rules is all I'm saying. Thx for replying. |
Quote:
|
Off My Headband, All Net ...
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
P.s. Doesn't say much for your teammates that you have to pass it off your head rather than to them😊 |
Fisting Illegal, Heading Legal ???
Quote:
|
Stupid NFHS Casebook Play ...
Quote:
|
Quote:
if i can call the throw off the board a try I'm going to do that. then when he catches and dribbles there is rule support for it... |
Quote:
He'd practically have to yell "I'm passing" before I'd consider it a pass, though. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
the case play says a pass can be caught off of the back board because it is the players own "equipment." you are right that is all it says. i don't think the rules really support that conclusion but the case book play says he can catch it. the rules also would not let him dribble again. but, if i say the throw off of the back board was a "try" and not a pass then he can catch it and then dribble it again etc. it becomes a rebound… if i can call it a try that is what i would do…. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:08pm. |