The Official Forum
Page 2 of 4 1 2 34
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   2014-2015 NFHS test (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/98546-2014-2015-nfhs-test.html)

Ed Maeder Wed Oct 22, 2014 08:05pm
True 1-19

OKREF Wed Oct 22, 2014 09:18pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by OKREF (Post 942239)
I was able to review my test on arbiter. Thoughts on this question?

Television replay equipment or monitoring equipment may be placed away from the court and information relayed to the coach on the bench during the game.

True or false
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNewsRef (Post 942249)
False
I answered false, and got it wrong. 1-19

Raymond Wed Oct 22, 2014 09:22pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by OKREF (Post 942262)
I answered false, and got it wrong. 1-19
you learn something new everyday.:)

Camron Rust Thu Oct 23, 2014 01:26am
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNewsRef (Post 942264)
you learn something new everyday.:)
That was a change in the last year or two. Previously, it was a technical foul.

I think they changed it since, with the proliferation high tech gear everywhere around us, it would be impossible to control and judge.

Moosie74 Thu Oct 23, 2014 09:24am
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNewsRef (Post 942207)
When does the NFHS post the new rule and case books on the NFHS hub? I won't be receiving my hard copy books until November 9th.
They are up now and have been for a few weeks now. Web access only but they are available and searchable.

Rich Fri Oct 24, 2014 08:51am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust (Post 942268)
That was a change in the last year or two. Previously, it was a technical foul.

I think they changed it since, with the proliferation high tech gear everywhere around us, it would be impossible to control and judge.
A case play covers that question better, actually.

Here's one from the test:

Q: If the timer erroneously runs the clock for more than five seconds, the referee has no authority to put five seconds on the clock.

Raymond Fri Oct 24, 2014 09:48am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich (Post 942351)
A case play covers that question better, actually.

Here's one from the test:

Q: If the timer erroneously runs the clock for more than five seconds, the referee has no authority to put five seconds on the clock.
False, 5-10, case plays from 5.10.1

OKREF Fri Oct 24, 2014 10:40am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich (Post 942351)
A case play covers that question better, actually.

Here's one from the test:

Q: If the timer erroneously runs the clock for more than five seconds, the referee has no authority to put five seconds on the clock.
False

Rich Fri Oct 24, 2014 12:21pm
Where's the definite knowledge of 5 seconds?

Or are you saying that if I know at least 5 seconds ran off it's perfectly OK for me to put 5 on, even though that's not an accurate number?

Raymond Fri Oct 24, 2014 12:36pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich (Post 942370)
Where's the definite knowledge of 5 seconds?

Or are you saying that if I know at least 5 seconds ran off it's perfectly OK for me to put 5 on, even though that's not an accurate number?
Oh, so it's a trick question? B/c we are definitely allowed to put time on the clock. That's the kind of crap I don't like on these tests.

"...the referee has no authority to put five seconds on the clock." is false b/c the referee does have that authority; whether or not he had definite knowledge is not addressed.

OKREF Fri Oct 24, 2014 01:19pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich (Post 942370)
Where's the definite knowledge of 5 seconds?

Or are you saying that if I know at least 5 seconds ran off it's perfectly OK for me to put 5 on, even though that's not an accurate number?
I don't have my rule books in front of me, but they do mention something about using counts to go by--5 second closely guarded, 10 second count. I have a habit of looking at the clock when my partner has a whistle, especially late in the game just for these kinds of things.

Camron Rust Fri Oct 24, 2014 03:15pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich (Post 942370)
Where's the definite knowledge of 5 seconds?

Or are you saying that if I know at least 5 seconds ran off it's perfectly OK for me to put 5 on, even though that's not an accurate number?
It is a given. If you know that at least 5 seconds elapsed you know it. The rule says nothing about the knowledge being compete or accurate. You put back as much as you know...but no more.

grunewar Fri Oct 24, 2014 05:35pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNewsRef (Post 942371)
That's the kind of crap I don't like on these tests.
Agreed!

Will. Must. May. Shall. Could. Some of my least favorite words.......

Camron Rust Fri Oct 24, 2014 06:59pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by grunewar (Post 942381)
Agreed!

Will. Must. May. Shall. Could. Some of my least favorite words.......
Why? Those are about the most clear words. What is wrong with them?

SNIPERBBB Sat Oct 25, 2014 07:18pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust (Post 942383)
Why? Those are about the most clear words. What is wrong with them?
You have to assume that they are interpreted correctly and defined as such in the rules.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:22am.
Page 2 of 4 1 2 34
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1