The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 05, 2014, 08:27pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Wisconsin / Kentucky

Block call at about 14:35 or so. Looked like an easy PC on replay.

Followed, of course, by a bit of idiocy from the announcers.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 05, 2014, 08:37pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Also at 11:53 (first half) followed by a pretty overt display of anger from the defender.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 05, 2014, 08:47pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 622
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam View Post
Also at 11:53 (first half) followed by a pretty overt display of anger from the defender.
Thought that was an easy PC call.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 05, 2014, 08:53pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Review for potential FF1, 5:10 left in 1st half.

Dead ball contact technical foul called.

Did they give Wisconsin the ball table side?
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 05, 2014, 08:59pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Wasilla Ak
Posts: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam View Post
Review for potential FF1, 5:10 left in 1st half.

Dead ball contact technical foul called.

Did they give Wisconsin the ball table side?
was that administered correctly?
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 05, 2014, 09:00pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,463
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam View Post
Review for potential FF1, 5:10 left in 1st half.

Dead ball contact technical foul called.

Did they give Wisconsin the ball table side?
It appeared they did.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 05, 2014, 09:01pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,463
Quote:
Originally Posted by AKOFL View Post
was that administered correctly?
Yes. It is not a POI administration. Dead ball contact fouls are treated the same as a NF T.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 05, 2014, 09:12pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Wasilla Ak
Posts: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge View Post
Yes. It is not a POI administration. Dead ball contact fouls are treated the same as a NF T.

Peace
thanks. so you can upgrade to a F1, F2, or Tech upon review?
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 05, 2014, 09:15pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,463
Quote:
Originally Posted by AKOFL View Post
thanks. so you can upgrade to a F1, F2, or Tech upon review?
You can always upgrade a foul for contact if it fits the definition of F1 or F2. But honestly, it does not matter unless you are going to eject the player for the contact. Dead ball contact plays really do not have a bigger penalty alone.
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 05, 2014, 09:18pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge View Post
You can always upgrade a foul for contact if it fits the definition of F1 or F2. But honestly, it does not matter unless you are going to eject the player for the contact. Dead ball contact plays really do not have a bigger penalty alone.
Two things are different.

1. Anyone can shoot the FTs.
2. Another T now disqualifies him.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 05, 2014, 09:23pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,463
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam View Post
Two things are different.

1. Anyone can shoot the FTs.
2. Another T now disqualifies him.
You are right. I was only trying to reference what you call the foul. Any dead ball contact foul is a T. You could have called it based on FF1 or FF2, but they still would have been Ts.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 05, 2014, 09:47pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 14,995
1. Little known NCAA rule permits the team to inbound either table side or opposite table following a technical foul, which is not POI.
2. The very rare example of offensive GT just occurred, but was not called, at 16:35 of the 2nd half.
3. Crew was rather poor on block/charge decision in the first half. Two or three fouls called blocks which were PCs, imo.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 05, 2014, 09:49pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 401
Goaltending?

Close goaltending no-call at 16:36 in second half. Would love to get another look at it. Was on its downward flight, appeared to be above the ring, but not sure it had the possibility of entering the basket.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 05, 2014, 10:04pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 14,995
Someone please explain to me what Pat Adams is seeing on these blocking calls.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 05, 2014, 10:10pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Canada, eh?
Posts: 1,628
Wow, today's colour commentators are making Billy Packer look good.
__________________
HOMER: Just gimme my gun.
CLERK: Hold on, the law requires a five-day waiting period; we've got run a background check...
HOMER: Five days???? But I'm mad NOW!!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wisconsin/PSU Rich Basketball 1 Tue Feb 21, 2012 12:22am
Kentucky - UConn (or Uconn - Kentucky) Conversation bob jenkins Basketball 24 Mon Apr 04, 2011 08:20pm
Wisconsin v WSU Game Suudy Football 4 Tue Sep 04, 2007 11:46am
Wisconsin officials wisref2 Football 2 Fri Oct 14, 2005 09:49am
Wisconsin LDUB Baseball 5 Sun Jul 25, 2004 10:59am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:10am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1