Wisconsin / Kentucky

[Johnny Ringo]

Originally Posted by Adam

Also at 11:53 (first half) followed by a pretty overt display of anger from the defender.

Thought that was an easy PC call.

[Adam]

Review for potential FF1, 5:10 left in 1st half.

Dead ball contact technical foul called.

Did they give Wisconsin the ball table side?

[AKOFL]

Originally Posted by Adam

Review for potential FF1, 5:10 left in 1st half.

Dead ball contact technical foul called.

Did they give Wisconsin the ball table side?

was that administered correctly?

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by AKOFL

was that administered correctly?

Yes. It is not a POI administration. Dead ball contact fouls are treated the same as a NF T.

Peace

[AKOFL]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

Yes. It is not a POI administration. Dead ball contact fouls are treated the same as a NF T.

Peace

thanks. so you can upgrade to a F1, F2, or Tech upon review?

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by AKOFL

thanks. so you can upgrade to a F1, F2, or Tech upon review?

You can always upgrade a foul for contact if it fits the definition of F1 or F2. But honestly, it does not matter unless you are going to eject the player for the contact. Dead ball contact plays really do not have a bigger penalty alone.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

You can always upgrade a foul for contact if it fits the definition of F1 or F2. But honestly, it does not matter unless you are going to eject the player for the contact. Dead ball contact plays really do not have a bigger penalty alone.

Two things are different.

1. Anyone can shoot the FTs.
2. Another T now disqualifies him.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by Adam

Review for potential FF1, 5:10 left in 1st half.

Dead ball contact technical foul called.

Did they give Wisconsin the ball table side?

It appeared they did.

Peace