E-mail to the top

[just another ref]

Originally Posted by Adam

The current editor of a book that includes a case play written years before her tenure began. Honestly, it appears to me she didn't put much thought into reading and understanding the case play and simply responded by taking her experience (as Nevadaref indicated) and applying it to NFHS rules.

I agree.

Frankly, I maintain there's no alternative way to interpret the case play that makes any sense. If they want to change it, like Rich, I think it would be fine. If they want to issue a clarification saying it's only applicable when two officials are just dicks and won't give any ground, then I'll take that to my local association and see how we want to handle it.

In the mean time....

I agree with this for the most part, also. We would be much better off if this case play did not exist at all. But, in my opinion, the option to discuss alternatives will always be preferable over we must report two things, even when one, by definition, is impossible.